|
Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript |
D.gnu - [Issue 656] New: lazy in main
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 Summary: lazy in main Product: GDC Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: glue layer AssignedTo: dvdfrdmn users.sf.net ReportedBy: csantander619 gmail.com Using GDC rev-50. //--------- int main (lazy char [][] args) { return args.length; } //--------- $ gdmd test $ ./test Illegal instruction $ ./test foo Illegal instruction //--------- How valid is this code? -- Dec 06 2006
d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 Summary: lazy in main Product: GDC Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: glue layer AssignedTo: dvdfrdmn users.sf.net ReportedBy: csantander619 gmail.com Using GDC rev-50. //--------- int main (lazy char [][] args) { return args.length; } //--------- $ gdmd test $ ./test Illegal instruction $ ./test foo Illegal instruction //--------- How valid is this code? Dec 06 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 ------- Comment #2 from csantander619 gmail.com 2006-12-06 16:53 ------- (In reply to comment #1)d-bugmail puremagic.com wrote:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 //--------- int main (lazy char [][] args) { return args.length; } //--------- $ gdmd test $ ./test Illegal instruction $ ./test foo Illegal instruction //--------- How valid is this code? Dec 06 2006
Are all of these recent bug reports specific to dgcc/gdc? I suspect that most of them are going to be present in dmd. Unless they're specific to gdc, the best category to file them would be under dmd. Only bugs specific to gdc should be filed against gdc since it relies on the dmd front end for the majority of the heavy lifting. Later, Brad Dec 06 2006
Brad Roberts escribió:Are all of these recent bug reports specific to dgcc/gdc? I suspect that most of them are going to be present in dmd. Unless they're specific to gdc, the best category to file them would be under dmd. Only bugs specific to gdc should be filed against gdc since it relies on the dmd front end for the majority of the heavy lifting. Later, Brad Dec 06 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 d-bugmail puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-12-06:http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 Dec 07 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 bugzilla digitalmars.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #4 from bugzilla digitalmars.com 2006-12-12 04:17 ------- Fixed DMD 0.176 -- Dec 12 2006
|