Digital Mars - D.gnu - GDC svn: Updated to 1.024 / 2.008

↑ ↓ ← → nobody <nobody impossible.de> writes:

David Friedman Wrote:

 Subversion updated to DMD 1.024 / 2.008.
 
 David


Hello,

i have checkout the new version from SVN with
svn co https://dgcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dgcc dgcc

I build succsesfully the gdc, but the libphobos library make problems:
 ~/D/gcc-4.1.2/libphobos./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2

checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... yes
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for g++... g++
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking If gcc can compile D sources... gcc: spec failure: unrecognized spec
option 'N'
actest.d:0: error: bad value (generic) for -mtune= switch
no
configure: error: can't compile D sources!

Mar 10 2008

↑ ↓ ← → David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> writes:

The library is meant to be built as part of GCC.  If you want to build 
it separately, you will need to take some extra steps.  First, you will 
probably need to change

	GDC=`echo $CC | sed s/xgcc/gdc/`

in the configure script to something like

	GDC=`which gdc`

I would also look at the config.status generated by the full GDC build 
to see what kinds of arguments you need to pass to the configure script.

David

nobody wrote:
 David Friedman Wrote:
 
 Subversion updated to DMD 1.024 / 2.008.

 David


 Hello,
 
 i have checkout the new version from SVN with
 svn co https://dgcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dgcc dgcc
 
 I build succsesfully the gdc, but the libphobos library make problems:
  ~/D/gcc-4.1.2/libphobos./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2
 
 checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
 checking whether build environment is sane... yes
 checking for gawk... no
 checking for mawk... mawk
 checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
 checking for gcc... gcc
 checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
 checking whether the C compiler works... yes
 checking whether we are cross compiling... yes
 checking for suffix of executables...
 checking for suffix of object files... o
 checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
 checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
 checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
 checking for g++... g++
 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
 checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
 checking for ranlib... ranlib
 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
 checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
 checking If gcc can compile D sources... gcc: spec failure: unrecognized spec
option 'N'
 actest.d:0: error: bad value (generic) for -mtune= switch
 no
 configure: error: can't compile D sources!

Mar 10 2008

↑ ↓ ← → nobody <nobody impossible.de> writes:

Thank you for your advice, i must change my notes ;-)
All compiles and run fine.


David Friedman Wrote:

 The library is meant to be built as part of GCC.  If you want to build 
 it separately, you will need to take some extra steps.  First, you will 
 probably need to change
 
 	GDC=`echo $CC | sed s/xgcc/gdc/`
 
 in the configure script to something like
 
 	GDC=`which gdc`
 
 I would also look at the config.status generated by the full GDC build 
 to see what kinds of arguments you need to pass to the configure script.
 
 David
 
 nobody wrote:
 David Friedman Wrote:
 
 Subversion updated to DMD 1.024 / 2.008.

 David


 Hello,
 
 i have checkout the new version from SVN with
 svn co https://dgcc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dgcc dgcc
 
 I build succsesfully the gdc, but the libphobos library make problems:
  ~/D/gcc-4.1.2/libphobos./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2
 
 checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
 checking whether build environment is sane... yes
 checking for gawk... no
 checking for mawk... mawk
 checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
 checking for gcc... gcc
 checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
 checking whether the C compiler works... yes
 checking whether we are cross compiling... yes
 checking for suffix of executables...
 checking for suffix of object files... o
 checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
 checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
 checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
 checking for g++... g++
 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
 checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
 checking for ranlib... ranlib
 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
 checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
 checking If gcc can compile D sources... gcc: spec failure: unrecognized spec
option 'N'
 actest.d:0: error: bad value (generic) for -mtune= switch
 no
 configure: error: can't compile D sources!

Mar 10 2008

↑ ↓ ← → David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> writes:

Anders F Bj�rklund wrote:
 David Friedman wrote:
 
 Subversion updated to DMD 1.024 / 2.008.


 Good news! Did you get a chance to look at
 the GCC 4.2 patches from Debian/Ubuntu too ?
 
 --anders


Yes, I saw the earlier post.  I'll check it out.

David

Mar 10 2008