www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D.gnu - D 2.0 support in SVN

reply David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> writes:
GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.

So as to not break other projects, the svn code still builds D 1.0 by 
default.  To build 2.0, run setup-gcc.sh like this:

gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh --d-language-version=2

When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source 
packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special 
option.

David
Sep 23 2007
parent reply =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
David Friedman wrote:


 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so 
 far.


Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)


 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source 
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special 
 option.


I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?

--anders
Sep 23 2007
parent reply Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:
Anders F Björklund wrote:


 David Friedman wrote:
 

 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.


 
 Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)
 

 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special
 option.


 
 I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?
 
 --anders


Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango
Sep 23 2007
parent reply Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:
Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:

 Anders F Björklund wrote:
 

 David Friedman wrote:


 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.


 Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)


 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special
 option.


 I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?

 --anders


 
 Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.
 


Same here. 1.0, please.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal
Sep 23 2007
next sibling parent Downs <default_357-line yahoo.de> writes:
Carlos Santander wrote:

 Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:

 Anders F Björklund wrote:


 David Friedman wrote:


 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.


 Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)


 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default. 
 Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a
 special
 option.


 I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?

 --anders


 Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.


 
 Same here. 1.0, please.
 


Agreed. What with the recent const changes (see d.D, "Const sucks"), the
current DMD 2.0 version is effectively already legacy and any code
written with it that takes advantage of constness will have to be
rewritten anyway.

1.0, please.
 --downs, who lost his keypair ;_;
Sep 24 2007
prev sibling next sibling parent "Anders Bergh" <anders1 gmail.com> writes:
On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> wrote:

 Same here. 1.0, please.


Same here aswell...
Sep 24 2007
prev sibling parent "Arthur Loiret" <arthur.loiret gmail.com> writes:
I'll upload a gdc-4.1/libphobos2 package to Debian experimental, but D
1.0 will stay the default version in Debian testing for now.

Thanks for D 2.0 support. :-)


Arthur.

2007/9/24, Anders Bergh <anders1 gmail.com>:

 On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> wrote:

 Same here. 1.0, please.


 Same here aswell...
Sep 24 2007