• David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> Sep 23 2007
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> Sep 23 2007
• Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> Sep 23 2007
• Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> Sep 23 2007
• Downs <default_357-line yahoo.de> Sep 24 2007
• "Anders Bergh" <anders1 gmail.com> Sep 24 2007
• "Arthur Loiret" <arthur.loiret gmail.com> Sep 24 2007

David Friedman <dvdfrdmn users.ess-eff.net> writes:

GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so far.

So as to not break other projects, the svn code still builds D 1.0 by 
default.  To build 2.0, run setup-gcc.sh like this:

gcc/d/setup-gcc.sh --d-language-version=2

When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source 
packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special 
option.

David

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

David Friedman wrote:

 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so 
 far.


Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)

 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source 
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special 
 option.


I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?

--anders

Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar igesund.net> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:

 David Friedman wrote:
 
 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.


 Great news! Will need to take a look at 2.0 then :-)
 
 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special
 option.


 I thought 1.0 was still the default language version ?
 
 --anders


Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango

Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:

Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:
 Anders F Björklund wrote:
 
 David Friedman wrote:

 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.



 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default.  Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a special
 option.



 --anders


 Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.
 


Same here. 1.0, please.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal

Downs <default_357-line yahoo.de> writes:

Carlos Santander wrote:
 Lars Ivar Igesund escribió:
 Anders F Björklund wrote:

 David Friedman wrote:

 GDC now has support for D 2.0!  I have tested it on Linux and Darwin so
 far.



 When GDC 0.25 is released, I will probably make 2.0 the default. 
 Source
 packages will contain only either 1.0 or 2.0 and will not need a
 special
 option.



 --anders


 Yes, that would be preferable, 2.0 isn't particularly stable.


 Same here. 1.0, please.
 


current DMD 2.0 version is effectively already legacy and any code
written with it that takes advantage of constness will have to be
rewritten anyway.

1.0, please.
 --downs, who lost his keypair ;_;

"Anders Bergh" <anders1 gmail.com> writes:

On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> wrote:
 Same here. 1.0, please.


Same here aswell...

"Arthur Loiret" <arthur.loiret gmail.com> writes:

I'll upload a gdc-4.1/libphobos2 package to Debian experimental, but D
1.0 will stay the default version in Debian testing for now.

Thanks for D 2.0 support. :-)


Arthur.

2007/9/24, Anders Bergh <anders1 gmail.com>:
 On 9/23/07, Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> wrote:
 Same here. 1.0, please.


 Same here aswell...