D.gnu - DMD 2.067.1 pulled into master
- Iain Buclaw (15/15) Mar 06 2016 Hi,
- Stefan Koch (2/18) Mar 21 2016 Big Thumbs Up!
- Jack Stouffer (4/8) Mar 22 2016 Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a
- Iain Buclaw via D.gnu (5/16) Mar 23 2016 There is still a lot of work (about 10k lines of refactor-going-on-rewri...
- Temtaime (3/24) Mar 23 2016 So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity.
- Jack Stouffer (3/5) Mar 23 2016 Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're making a
- Temtaime (11/16) Mar 23 2016 2.067 frontend is outdated, isn't it ? For instance i can't build
- Jack Stouffer (6/25) Mar 23 2016 You changed the subject. We were taking about the status of the
- Iain Buclaw via D.gnu (8/26) Mar 23 2016 In all likelihood, we'd just jump from 2.068 to LATEST in one leap.
-
Sebastien Alaiwan via D.gnu
(116/136)
Mar 23 2016
From: Sebastien Alaiwan
- Kai Nacke (5/8) Mar 24 2016 No.
Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated. -fd-verbose: Deprecated in favour of --verbose (-v) -fd-vtls: Deprecated in favour of -ftransition=tls (equivalent to -transition=tls) -fd-vgc: Deprecated in favour of -ftransition=nogc (equivalent to -vgc) -femit-moduleinfo: Deprecated in favour of -fmoduleinfo, as the default is always ON. -ftransition=field: New switch, equivalent to -transition=field in the new 2.068 branch that has opened up. dub, and others that interact with GDC, please take note. ;-)
Mar 06 2016
Stefan Koch <uplink.coder googlemail.com> On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated. -fd-verbose: Deprecated in favour of --verbose (-v) -fd-vtls: Deprecated in favour of -ftransition=tls (equivalent to -transition=tls) -fd-vgc: Deprecated in favour of -ftransition=nogc (equivalent to -vgc) -femit-moduleinfo: Deprecated in favour of -fmoduleinfo, as the default is always ON. -ftransition=field: New switch, equivalent to -transition=field I will try to also deprecate the other main culprits from others that interact with GDC, please take note. ;-)Big Thumbs Up!
Mar 21 2016
On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated.Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a lot more work needed before this happened. What's the future of GDC in terms of speed of releases.
Mar 22 2016
On 23 March 2016 at 05:18, Jack Stouffer via D.gnu <d.gnu puremagic.com> wrote:On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:There is still a lot of work (about 10k lines of refactor-going-on-rewrite) needed for it. It may support all 2.067 features, but it's still using the old codegen interface that has been removed in upstream. ;-)Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated.Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a lot more work needed before this happened. What's the future of GDC in terms of speed of releases.
Mar 23 2016
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 08:58:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:On 23 March 2016 at 05:18, Jack Stouffer via D.gnu <d.gnu puremagic.com> wrote:So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:There is still a lot of work (about 10k lines of refactor-going-on-rewrite) needed for it. It may support all 2.067 features, but it's still using the old codegen interface that has been removed in upstream. ;-)Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated.Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a lot more work needed before this happened. What's the future of GDC in terms of speed of releases.
Mar 23 2016
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 11:24:07 UTC, Temtaime wrote:So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're making a very unfunny joke.
Mar 23 2016
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:20:56 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 11:24:07 UTC, Temtaime wrote:2.067 frontend is outdated, isn't it ? For instance i can't build my code with dmd < 2.069 due to tons of bugs in the frontend. And when i discover new bugs, i have to write ugly workarounds, and i have to remove them when there's new version of frontend with bugfixes. And yes, keeping them to support outdated frontend versions is a bad practice. So in Q1 2016 GDC is only 2.067. And it isn't based on D frontend, so when it will be time to move to D frontend, the gap will raise. You see ?So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're making a very unfunny joke.
Mar 23 2016
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:35:47 UTC, Temtaime wrote:On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:20:56 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:You changed the subject. We were taking about the status of the GDC project, and now you're talking about its obsolescence. These are two different things. Considering the fact that GDC just merged a huge new update, no it's not "dead".On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 11:24:07 UTC, Temtaime wrote:2.067 frontend is outdated, isn't it ? For instance i can't build my code with dmd < 2.069 due to tons of bugs in the frontend. And when i discover new bugs, i have to write ugly workarounds, and i have to remove them when there's new version of frontend with bugfixes. And yes, keeping them to support outdated frontend versions is a bad practice. So in Q1 2016 GDC is only 2.067. And it isn't based on D frontend, so when it will be time to move to D frontend, the gap will raise. You see ?So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're making a very unfunny joke.
Mar 23 2016
On 23 March 2016 at 14:35, Temtaime via D.gnu <d.gnu puremagic.com> wrote:On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:20:56 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:In all likelihood, we'd just jump from 2.068 to LATEST in one leap. Because as far as I'm concerned every release since 2.069 is a horribly broken release, and until upstream fixes their code, there's no chance of moving forward. However the compiler implementation itself will remain being compatible with 2.068 features. So there is no rush to bootstrap it, or to start cherry-picking bug fixes today.On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 11:24:07 UTC, Temtaime wrote:2.067 frontend is outdated, isn't it ? For instance i can't build my code with dmd < 2.069 due to tons of bugs in the frontend. And when i discover new bugs, i have to write ugly workarounds, and i have to remove them when there's new version of frontend with bugfixes. And yes, keeping them to support outdated frontend versions is a bad practice. So in Q1 2016 GDC is only 2.067. And it isn't based on D frontend, so when it will be time to move to D frontend, the gap will raise. You see ?So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're making a very unfunny joke.
Mar 23 2016
From: Sebastien Alaiwan <sebastien.alaiwan gmail.com> To: "D.gnu" <d.gnu puremagic.com> Message-ID: <56F2DBC2.9090604 gmail.com> Subject: Re: DMD 2.067.1 pulled into master References: <axjwbwiuifnjaaomcizd forum.dlang.org> <mtfxtfvbbmfzbkgnwrsy forum.dlang.org> <mailman.598.1458723554.26339.d.gnu puremagic.com> <mjwaxryjizztlbemmtog forum.dlang.org> In-Reply-To: <mjwaxryjizztlbemmtog forum.dlang.org> --daCkFwa39IiRkmwqOkOKLK63v0FWEKLAh Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010208010707050801070101" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010208010707050801070101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-03-23 12:24, Temtaime via D.gnu wrote:On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 08:58:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:m> wrote:On 23 March 2016 at 05:18, Jack Stouffer via D.gnu <d.gnu puremagic.co=mand-line arguments have been added / deprecated.On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:Hi, https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99 This is now in master. Outside of the D changelog the following com=more work needed before this happened.Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a lot=rite) needed for it. It may support all 2.067 features, but it's still u= sing the old codegen interface that has been removed in upstream. ;-)What's the future of GDC in terms of speed of releases.There is still a lot of work (about 10k lines of refactor-going-on-rew=So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity.You must have a curious definition of 'dead'.No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Is LDC currently suffering from a lack of developers? --------------010208010707050801070101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Ty= pe"> </head> <div class=3D"moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-03-23 12:24, Temtaime via D.gn= u wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote cite=3D"mid:mjwaxryjizztlbemmtog forum.dlang.org" type=3D"cite"> <div class=3D"moz-text-flowed" style=3D"font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 12px;" lang=3D"x-unicode"> <br> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 08:58:5= 8 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: <blockquote type=3D"cite"> On 23 March 2016 at 05:18, Jack Stouffer via D.gnu <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" class=3D"moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=3D"mailto:d.gnu puremagic.com"><a class=3D"moz-txt-lin= k-rfc2396E" href=3D"mailto:d.gnu puremagic.com"><d.gnu puremagic.com&g= t;</a></a> wrote: <br> <br> , 6 March 2016 at 16:41:03 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: <br> <br> <br> <br> <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" class=3D"moz-txt-link-freetex= t" href=3D"https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99">https://github.= com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/pull/99</a> <br> <br> This is now in master.=C2=A0 Outside of the D changelog t= he following command-line arguments have been added / deprecated. <br> <br> </blockquote> <br> Wow, congrats. From your comments elsewhere I assumed there was a lot more work needed before this happened. <br> <br> What's the future of GDC in terms of speed of releases. <br> <br> </blockquote> <br> There is still a lot of work (about 10k lines of refactor-going-on-rewrite) needed for it.=C2=A0 It may suppor= t all 2.067 features, but it's still using the old codegen interface that has been removed in upstream. <span class=3D"moz-smiley-s3" title=3D";-)"><span>;-)</span></spa= n> <br> </blockquote> </div> <br> So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity. <br> </div> </blockquote> You must have a curious definition of 'dead'.<br> <br> <blockquote cite=3D"mid:mjwaxryjizztlbemmtog forum.dlang.org" type=3D"cite"> <div class=3D"moz-text-flowed" style=3D"font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 12px;" lang=3D"x-unicode">No one from GDC's team wanna= join LDC's one ? <br> </div> </blockquote> Is LDC currently suffering from a lack of developers?<br> <br> </body> </html> --------------010208010707050801070101-- --daCkFwa39IiRkmwqOkOKLK63v0FWEKLAh--
Mar 23 2016
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 18:09:06 UTC, Sebastien Alaiwan wrote:On 2016-03-23 12:24, Temtaime via D.gnu wrote:No. Regards, KaiNo one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?Is LDC currently suffering from a lack of developers?
Mar 24 2016