D.gnu - gdmd name
- "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle4 juno.com> Feb 15 2004
- Andy Friesen <andy ikagames.com> Feb 15 2004
- resistor mac.com Feb 15 2004
- John Reimer <jjreimer telus.net> Feb 15 2004
- "C" <dont respond.com> Feb 15 2004
- resistor mac.com Feb 15 2004
- "C" <dont respond.com> Feb 15 2004
- Andy Friesen <andy ikagames.com> Feb 15 2004
- J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> Feb 16 2004
- resistor mac.com Feb 16 2004
- "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle4 juno.com> Feb 17 2004
- J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> Feb 17 2004
- resistor mac.com Feb 17 2004
- Robert Jones<robertjones21 HotPOP.com> Feb 21 2004
- "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle4 juno.com> Feb 21 2004
- John Reimer <jjreimer telus.net> Feb 26 2004
- resistor mac.com Feb 27 2004
- "Kris" <someidiot earthlink.net> Feb 26 2004
I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 15 2004
Ben Hinkle wrote:I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
dindm is not digital mars. *shudder* -- andy
Feb 15 2004
I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC. Many UNIX systems define the system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler should be DC. GCC is the GNU C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence the GNU version of DC should be GDC. Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. Owen In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if there are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do. One reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source so it really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 15 2004
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:42:18 +0000, resisto wrote:I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection
I think DGCC is a good logical start. GCD is actually funny if you think of it. DCC is not really accurate (it's not really a D compiler collection). Just an opinion. Great work! John R.
Feb 15 2004
what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote. C <resistor mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1 digitaldaemon.com...I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
UNIX systems define the system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler
DC. GCC is the GNU C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence
GNU version of DC should be GDC. Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. Owen In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if
are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do.
reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source
really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 15 2004
G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77. Please, let's not get into naming it like Windows versions! Owen In article <c0oou4$2edt$1 digitaldaemon.com>, C says...what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote. C <resistor mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oi2q$23og$1 digitaldaemon.com...I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
UNIX systems define the system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler
DC. GCC is the GNU C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.) Hence
GNU version of DC should be GDC. Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. Owen In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if
are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do.
reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source
really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 15 2004
Hehe, I was refering to the 2004 1.0 standard , but its no good anyway. Charlie <resistor mac.com> wrote in message news:c0oqkm$2h6n$1 digitaldaemon.com...G77 is so named because it compiles Fortran-77. Please, let's not get
naming it like Windows versions! Owen In article <c0oou4$2edt$1 digitaldaemon.com>, C says...what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my
C <resistor mac.com> wrote in message
I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other
based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection Probably the nomenclature most in-line with the UNIX tradition is GDC.
UNIX systems define the system C compiler to be CC (C Compiler). Hence the system D compiler
DC. GCC is the GNU C Compiler (Well, it was originally. It's now far more than that.)
theGNU version of DC should be GDC. Overall, I don't think it makes that much difference. Owen In article <c0o2lk$1btb$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see
thereare any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't
Onereason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd
so itreally is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 15 2004
C wrote:what about g04 , like g77 ? hmm no that sucks actually. GDC gets my vote.
The only problem with gdc is that it's very similar to gdb. (the GNU debugger) -- andy
Feb 15 2004
resistor mac.com wrote:I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection
I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. New suggestion: ODC - Open D Compiler [...]Owen
-- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Feb 16 2004
In terms of aesthetics, I like GDMD and GDC the best, with GCD and ODC coming in second. But that's just me. Owen In article <c0rp0l$19vh$1 digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...resistor mac.com wrote:I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas based on the naming of other GCC frontends: GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) GCD - GNU Compiler for D DCC - D Compiler Collection
I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. New suggestion: ODC - Open D Compiler [...]Owen
-- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Feb 16 2004
"J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message news:c0rp0l$19vh$1 digitaldaemon.com... | resistor mac.com wrote: | > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas | > based on the naming of | > other GCC frontends: | > | > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) | > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) | > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) | > GCD - GNU Compiler for D | > DCC - D Compiler Collection | | I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. One reason I didn't use one of those to start with was that I couldn't tell one from the other. One can barely tell the difference between "jee" "cee" "cee" and "jee" "cee" "dee" or "jee" "dee" "cee". | New suggestion: | ODC - Open D Compiler I like the idea of breaking away from the "g". And how do I put something on the OpenD web site, anyway? | [...] | > Owen | | -- | Justin | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
Feb 17 2004
Ben Hinkle wrote:"J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message news:c0rp0l$19vh$1 digitaldaemon.com... | resistor mac.com wrote: | > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas | > based on the naming of | > other GCC frontends: | > | > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) | > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) | > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) | > GCD - GNU Compiler for D | > DCC - D Compiler Collection | | I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. One reason I didn't use one of those to start with was that I couldn't tell one from the other. One can barely tell the difference between "jee" "cee" "cee" and "jee" "cee" "dee" or "jee" "dee" "cee".
That's a fair criticism.| New suggestion: | ODC - Open D Compiler I like the idea of breaking away from the "g". And how do I put something on the OpenD web site, anyway?
I don't know, but I'll throw out some guess... The request form may be helpful: http://www.opend.org/Request.html I think Jan Knepper created the site and I suspect it runs on his server. I don't think he follows the D or D.gnu groups usually, but he does follow the c++.windows.32-bits group. As you can see from visiting the site, Burton Radons is the main uploader (dli, dig, etc.). But he hasn't uploaded anything in a while. -- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Feb 17 2004
It seems like nobody is greatly moved by the new names, so I'd like to motion that it be left as GDMD, at least for now. I mean, it's a nice name that's easily differentiable from everything else and still is representative of what the program is. Owen In article <c0t5sd$g9d$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says..."J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message news:c0rp0l$19vh$1 digitaldaemon.com... | resistor mac.com wrote: | > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas | > based on the naming of | > other GCC frontends: | > | > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) | > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) | > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) | > GCD - GNU Compiler for D | > DCC - D Compiler Collection | | I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. One reason I didn't use one of those to start with was that I couldn't tell one from the other. One can barely tell the difference between "jee" "cee" "cee" and "jee" "cee" "dee" or "jee" "dee" "cee". | New suggestion: | ODC - Open D Compiler I like the idea of breaking away from the "g". And how do I put something on the OpenD web site, anyway? | [...] | > Owen | | -- | Justin | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
Feb 17 2004
In article <c0uk29$2s1l$1 digitaldaemon.com>, resistor mac.com says...It seems like nobody is greatly moved by the new names, so I'd like to motion that it be left as GDMD, at least for now. I mean, it's a nice name that's easily differentiable from everything else and still is representative of what the program is. Owen In article <c0t5sd$g9d$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says..."J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message news:c0rp0l$19vh$1 digitaldaemon.com... | resistor mac.com wrote: | > I don't think there's anything wrong with GDMD, but here's a few other ideas | > based on the naming of | > other GCC frontends: | > | > GDC - GNU D Compiler (from GPC - GNU Pascal Compiler) | > DGCC - D for GCC (from CGCC - Cobol for GCC and PL1GCC - PL1 for GCC) | > GD - GNU D (from GM2 - GNU Modula-2) | > GCD - GNU Compiler for D | > DCC - D Compiler Collection | | I like GCD (like GCJ for Java) and GDC. One reason I didn't use one of those to start with was that I couldn't tell one from the other. One can barely tell the difference between "jee" "cee" "cee" and "jee" "cee" "dee" or "jee" "dee" "cee". | New suggestion: | ODC - Open D Compiler
I like the idea of breaking away from the "g". And how do I put something on the OpenD web site, anyway? | [...] | > Owen | | -- | Justin | http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/ |
-- Robert
Feb 21 2004
| How about FDC - Free D Compiler or just DC - D Compiler. "fdc" might be ok (the same ball-park as "odc") but "dc" is the standard "desk calculator" program.
Feb 21 2004
Ben Hinkle wrote:| How about FDC - Free D Compiler or just DC - D Compiler. "fdc" might be ok (the same ball-park as "odc") but "dc" is the standard "desk calculator" program.
It's a funny thing... gdmd -- the title of this topic -- is beginning to grow on me...
Feb 26 2004
Yeah, that's what happened to me. I wrote that post with a lot of suggestion, and then realized that I really like GDMD better than any of them. ;) Owen In article <c1msku$lef$1 digitaldaemon.com>, John Reimer says...Ben Hinkle wrote:| How about FDC - Free D Compiler or just DC - D Compiler. "fdc" might be ok (the same ball-park as "odc") but "dc" is the standard "desk calculator" program.
It's a funny thing... gdmd -- the title of this topic -- is beginning to grow on me...
Feb 27 2004
What about just plain old GNUD, pronounced like 'thud' -- perhaps with a silent 'g' :-) "Ben Hinkle" <bhinkle4 juno.com> wrote in message news:c0o2lk$1btb$1 digitaldaemon.com...I've been using the name gdmd for the gnu compiler but I'd like to see if
are any other suggestions. DLI was specific to linux, so that won't do.
reason I kept the "dmd" in the name was that the code uses the dmd source
really is a gnu port of the dmd source. Anyhow, post if you have comments. -Ben
Feb 26 2004









Andy Friesen <andy ikagames.com> 