|
Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript |
D.gnu - previous gcc front-end attempts?
Can someone summarize what happened to the previous attempts to get a D front-end? I read some of the post in this newsgroup and it seemed like the D frontend was successfully compiled by gcc. I just tried adding a .cpp file to the sample front-end "treelang" that comes with GCC and it looks like that will work as long as you compile it with an existing g++ and not xgcc (the compiler from the previous bootstrap stage). How far had people gotten with the interface between gcc backend and D front-end? -Ben Nov 12 2003
Ben Hinkle wrote:Can someone summarize what happened to the previous attempts to get a D front-end? I read some of the post in this newsgroup and it seemed like the D frontend was successfully compiled by gcc. Nov 12 2003
Does this use gcc's "main" or D's "main"? I don't see the gcc Make-lang.in, config-lang.in, etc so I'm guessing it uses D's main. -Ben "Jan Knepper" <jan smartsoft.us> wrote in message news:bou9jv$pbm$1 digitaldaemon.com...Ben Hinkle wrote:Can someone summarize what happened to the previous attempts to get a D front-end? I read some of the post in this newsgroup and it seemed like the D Nov 14 2003
Ben Hinkle wrote:Does this use gcc's "main" or D's "main"? Nov 14 2003
|