D.gnu - GDC 0.20 ? RPMS ?
↑ ↓ ← → =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Any news about updating to DMD 0.166 "RC" ?
Or about providing RPMs for Fedora Core 5 ?
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → Lucas Goss <lgoss007 gmail.com> writes:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Any news about updating to DMD 0.166 "RC" ?
Or about providing RPMs for Fedora Core 5 ?
--anders
I was gonna ask about deb's but...
Can't you use alien to convert it to rpm? I just did it for deb and it
worked fine. First I had to convert the tar.bz2 to tar.gz (slackware
format), but once it was in tar.gz alien made the deb package.
lucas
↑ ↓ ← → =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Lucas Goss wrote:
Can't you use alien to convert it to rpm? I just did it for deb and it
worked fine. First I had to convert the tar.bz2 to tar.gz (slackware
format), but once it was in tar.gz alien made the deb package.
Nah, I had made RPMs for Fedora Core 5 and just wondered if they could
be posted to the "dgcc" project without me having to start a "gdcrpm"...
:-)
http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1539137&group_id=154306&atid=791255
In your deb, did you just wrap the "gdc-0.19-linux-i386.tar.bz2" or did
you compile the gcc/gdc from source code ? (I built mine, in my package)
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → Lucas Goss <lgoss007 gmail.com> writes:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
In your deb, did you just wrap the "gdc-0.19-linux-i386.tar.bz2" or did
you compile the gcc/gdc from source code ? (I built mine, in my package)
--anders
No I didn't compile it. I just used alien to convert it from a slackware
package to a debian package.
I've looked at building packages from source, but I always run away once
I look at the creation process. Seems like an awful lot of work just to
copy files to bin, lib, and include (yes, I know it does more than that).
lucas
↑ ↓ ← → Fredrik Olsson <peylow gmail.com> writes:
Vincenzo Ampolo skrev:
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 20:54 +0200, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Nah, I had made RPMs for Fedora Core 5 and just wondered if they could
be posted to the "dgcc" project without me having to start a
"gdcrpm"...
I'm working to creating a standard ubuntu/debian package for gdc
compiling gcc from source.
Have anybody done it yet?
use it and be grateful from day 1.
It is apt we speak about right? You have to forgive my Linux unawarenes :).
// Fredrik Olsson
↑ ↓ ← → =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
I've already done the configuration files but now the compiling process
is stopped due to this bug:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1561040&group_id=154306&atid=791252
I hope that it will be fixed soon so the packages can be created...
Can't you use GCC 3.x ("compat") to bootstrap GDC with e.g. GCC 4.0.3 ?
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → =?UTF-8?B?QW5kZXJzIEYgQmrDtnJrbHVuZA==?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
Sure i can try it: i can use gcc-3.4 to compile gcc-4.0 with gdc
support.
Until now i tried to build gcc-4.0 with gdc support using gcc-4.0
I had to use GCC 3.2 - since GCC 4.1 doesn't work with GDC yet -
it should work with GCC 4.0 but I think you had a patched version ?
Anyway, bootstrapping GCC is a great way to make it run when the
system compiler is either too old (Red Hat 7.3) or too new (FC 5)
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → =?UTF-8?B?QW5kZXJzIEYgQmrDtnJrbHVuZA==?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
I had to use GCC 3.2 - since GCC 4.1 doesn't work with GDC yet -
it should work with GCC 4.0 but I think you had a patched version ?
Same error using gcc 3.4 to compile gcc 4.0
Is that the same error with the bad values
for the arch and tune switches, or which ?
./../src/gcc/d/dmd/idgen.c:1: error: bad value () for
-march= switch
../../src/gcc/d/dmd/idgen.c:1: error: bad value () for
-mtune= switch
I don't get that here, for either of
-march=i386 or -mcpu=ppc flag settings.
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → Vincenzo Ampolo <vincenzo.ampolo gmail.com> writes:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 20:54 +0200, Anders F Bj=C3=B6rklund wrote:
Nah, I had made RPMs for Fedora Core 5 and just wondered if they could
be posted to the "dgcc" project without me having to start a
"gdcrpm"...=20
I'm working to creating a standard ubuntu/debian package for gdc
compiling gcc from source.
Have anybody done it yet?
--=20
Vincenzo Ampolo
http://www.nanofreesoft.org
http://vincenzoampolo.nanofreesoft.org
http://idp.nanofreesoft.org
↑ ↓ ← → Vincenzo Ampolo <vincenzo.ampolo gmail.com> writes:
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 19:56 +0200, Fredrik Olsson wrote:
Not that I know of, but I know of two people (not me included) that
will=20
use it and be grateful from day 1.
=20
It is apt we speak about right? You have to forgive my Linux
unawarenes :).
=20
Sure, something like: apt-get install gdc-4.0 and then you can use gdc
on your system.
I've already done the configuration files but now the compiling process
is stopped due to this bug:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=3Ddetail&aid=3D1561040&group_=
id=3D154306&atid=3D791252
I hope that it will be fixed soon so the packages can be created...
--=20
Vincenzo Ampolo
http://www.nanofreesoft.org
http://vincenzoampolo.nanofreesoft.org
http://idp.nanofreesoft.org
↑ ↓ ← → Vincenzo Ampolo <vincenzo.ampolo gmail.com> writes:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 09:55 +0200, Anders F Bj=C3=B6rklund wrote:
Can't you use GCC 3.x ("compat") to bootstrap GDC with e.g. GCC
4.0.3 ?
Sure i can try it: i can use gcc-3.4 to compile gcc-4.0 with gdc
support.
Until now i tried to build gcc-4.0 with gdc support using gcc-4.0
Stay tuned!
--=20
Vincenzo Ampolo
http://www.nanofreesoft.org
http://vincenzoampolo.nanofreesoft.org
http://idp.nanofreesoft.org
↑ ↓ ← → Vincenzo Ampolo <vincenzo.ampolo gmail.com> writes:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 14:06 +0200, Anders F Bj=C3=B6rklund wrote:
I had to use GCC 3.2 - since GCC 4.1 doesn't work with GDC yet -
it should work with GCC 4.0 but I think you had a patched version ?=20
Same error using gcc 3.4 to compile gcc 4.0
Yes, all the compilers are patched by debian, they are the default in
the archive and they are used to compile the whole distro.
I think that this problem is related with the code of dmd itself. btw
i'm trying with gcc 3.2
and.. compiling debian patched gcc-4.0 using gcc-4.0 works (so if i
don't compile gdc there are no errors)
--=20
Vincenzo Ampolo
http://www.nanofreesoft.org
http://vincenzoampolo.nanofreesoft.org
http://idp.nanofreesoft.org
↑ ↓ ← → =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:
Any news about updating to DMD 0.166 "RC" ?
Never mind, I'll just use rev20 from the SVN.
Or about providing RPMs for Fedora Core 5 ?
Never mind, I'll just build and host my own...
--anders
↑ ↓ ← → Vincenzo Ampolo <vincenzo.ampolo gmail.com> writes:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:38 +0200, Anders F Bj=C3=B6rklund wrote:
Is that the same error with the bad values
for the arch and tune switches, or which ?
=20
./../src/gcc/d/dmd/idgen.c:1: error: bad value () for
-march=3D switch
../../src/gcc/d/dmd/idgen.c:1: error: bad value () for
-mtune=3D switch
=20
I don't get that here, for either of
-march=3Di386 or -mcpu=3Dppc flag settings.=20
Sorry for the late answer, but i had internet problems.
It seems a problem related with cross compilation, i'll do more tests
and i'll post results..
thanks...
--=20
Vincenzo Ampolo
http://www.nanofreesoft.org
http://vincenzoampolo.nanofreesoft.org
http://idp.nanofreesoft.org
|