|
Archives
D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger
C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows
digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript
|
D.gnu - GDC D compiler for PocketPCs is here!
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
I've finally managed to get this cross-compiler to make a working "hello
world" program that runs on my PDA. The source for the program is follows:
import std.file;
void main()
{
std.file.write( "doutput.txt", "Hello world!" );
}
I have uploaded more information, the sources, and the binaries to a
temporary file sharing place at the following URL:
http://www.bigupload.com/d=F902F09C
I am hoping someone will hook me up with dedicated hosting for this.
I'm also hoping this can be merged into the main GDC sources at some
point.
It is probably very buggy now, and I haven't tested very much of it at
all. I'll be trying to get it up to v0.19 (it's GDC 0.18 now) in a
while, and debug what I can. I can probably debug Phobos stuff, but the
compiler errors are a bit much for me.
Enjoy.
↑ ↓ ← → Manfred Hansen <m.hansen kielnet.net> writes:
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 04:28:55 -0400 schrieb Chad J:
I've finally managed to get this cross-compiler to make a working "hello
world" program that runs on my PDA. The source for the program is follows:
import std.file;
void main()
{
std.file.write( "doutput.txt", "Hello world!" );
}
I have uploaded more information, the sources, and the binaries to a
temporary file sharing place at the following URL:
http://www.bigupload.com/d=F902F09C
I am hoping someone will hook me up with dedicated hosting for this.
I'm also hoping this can be merged into the main GDC sources at some
point.
It is probably very buggy now, and I haven't tested very much of it at
all. I'll be trying to get it up to v0.19 (it's GDC 0.18 now) in a
while, and debug what I can. I can probably debug Phobos stuff, but the
compiler errors are a bit much for me.
Enjoy.
Hello,
i have try to compile
void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6
I have copy the arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile
void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6
I have copy the arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there is
a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and see
how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
↑ ↓ ← → Frits van Bommel <fvbommel REMwOVExCAPSs.nl> writes:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the arm-wince-pe
directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there is
a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and see
how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back up
my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with your
arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
↑ ↓ ← → pedro alves <pedro.alves domatica.pt> writes:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd
sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the
arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there
is a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and
see how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back
up my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with
your arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
That sure looks like it. That is arm assembly on the error log, and ' '
is the comment char on arm assembly,
and it is also the first character the assembler is complaining about.
Isn't there a gdc -v switch to show what commands are being invoked?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
pedro alves wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd
sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the
arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there
is a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and
see how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back
up my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with
your arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
That sure looks like it. That is arm assembly on the error log, and ' '
is the comment char on arm assembly,
and it is also the first character the assembler is complaining about.
Isn't there a gdc -v switch to show what commands are being invoked?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
hehe I was just about to ask for that.
Manfred, try
arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
and give us the output.
To answer your question Frits, the binutils come from a cegcc linux
binary prerelease. As a result, the binutils were built on a computer
that is not my own, only the arm-wince-pe-gdc itself (and *-gcc and
*-g++) were built by me. They are bundled with the compiler and have
worked for me. It looks from the errors like the binutils are working
fine, they just can't turn x86 assembly into ARM machine code.
↑ ↓ ← → Manfred Hansen <m.hansen kielnet.net> writes:
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:59:47 -0400 schrieb Chad J:
pedro alves wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd
sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the
arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there
is a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and
see how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back
up my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with
your arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
That sure looks like it. That is arm assembly on the error log, and ' '
is the comment char on arm assembly,
and it is also the first character the assembler is complaining about.
Isn't there a gdc -v switch to show what commands are being invoked?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
hehe I was just about to ask for that.
Manfred, try
arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
and give us the output.
To answer your question Frits, the binutils come from a cegcc linux
binary prerelease. As a result, the binutils were built on a computer
that is not my own, only the arm-wince-pe-gdc itself (and *-gcc and
*-g++) were built by me. They are bundled with the compiler and have
worked for me. It looks from the errors like the binutils are working
fine, they just can't turn x86 assembly into ARM machine code.
This is the with switch -v:
ansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v -c hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-wince-pe
Configured with: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d -quiet
-dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase-strip hello_arm -version -o /tmp/ccJ0gw9a.sGNU D
version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param ggc-min-heapsize=64021
as -o hello_arm /tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
On my debian system i have made a softlink from /usr/bin/as to
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
Then it was possible to compile an object file.
I have delete the softlink and it is also posslible to make a
object file. I dont't now why?
Here is the output:
n localhost:~$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet.
Lesen der Spezifikationen von
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-wince-pe/lib/libgphobos.spec
Spezifikation wird von lib nach liborig umbenannt
Ziel: arm-wince-pe
Konfiguriert mit: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread-Modell: single
gcc-Version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d -quiet
-dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase hello_arm -version -o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
GNU D version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC-Heuristik: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31989
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as -o /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/collect2 -Bdynamic -o
hello_arm /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm
wince-pe/lib/crt0.o /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-
ince-pe/lib/crtst.o -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../..
../arm-wince-pe/lib -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/usr/lib /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o -lgphobos -lm -lcegcc -lgcc
-lm -lcoredll -lcegcc -lgcc
collect2: �ld� kann nicht gefunden werden
I looks much better.
Only one problem with collect2 .
Manfred
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:59:47 -0400 schrieb Chad J:
pedro alves wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd
sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the
arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there
is a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and
see how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back
up my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with
your arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
That sure looks like it. That is arm assembly on the error log, and ' '
is the comment char on arm assembly,
and it is also the first character the assembler is complaining about.
Isn't there a gdc -v switch to show what commands are being invoked?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
hehe I was just about to ask for that.
Manfred, try
arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
and give us the output.
To answer your question Frits, the binutils come from a cegcc linux
binary prerelease. As a result, the binutils were built on a computer
that is not my own, only the arm-wince-pe-gdc itself (and *-gcc and
*-g++) were built by me. They are bundled with the compiler and have
worked for me. It looks from the errors like the binutils are working
fine, they just can't turn x86 assembly into ARM machine code.
This is the with switch -v:
ansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v -c hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-wince-pe
Configured with: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d
-quiet -dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase-strip hello_arm -version -o
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.sGNU D version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param ggc-min-heapsize=64021
as -o hello_arm /tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
On my debian system i have made a softlink from /usr/bin/as to
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
Then it was possible to compile an object file.
I have delete the softlink and it is also posslible to make a
object file. I dont't now why?
Here is the output:
n localhost:~$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet.
Lesen der Spezifikationen von
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-wince-pe/lib/libgphobos.spec
Spezifikation wird von lib nach liborig umbenannt
Ziel: arm-wince-pe
Konfiguriert mit: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread-Modell: single
gcc-Version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d
-quiet -dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase hello_arm -version -o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
GNU D version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC-Heuristik: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31989
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as -o /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/collect2 -Bdynamic -o
hello_arm /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm
wince-pe/lib/crt0.o /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-
ince-pe/lib/crtst.o -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../..
../arm-wince-pe/lib -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/usr/lib /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o -lgphobos -lm -lcegcc -lgcc
-lm -lcoredll -lcegcc -lgcc
collect2: �ld� kann nicht gefunden werden
I looks much better.
Only one problem with collect2 .
Manfred
Ah it seems to be the opposite of what I though, it is using an x86
assembler to assemble ARM code. Notice that in the top log it invokes
'as' instead of /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as. In the
bottom log it seems to be unable to find 'ld', when it should be using
arm-wince-pe-ld.
I am wondering if it can't find the files in */bin for some reason, and
ends up falling back on the local system files that are used for x86. I
also have a hunch this could be something to do with permissions.
If you don't need to restrict access to the compiler, try this:
cd /usr/local
chmod -R a=rwx arm-wince-pe
Then try compiling.
↑ ↓ ← → Manfred Hansen <m.hansen kielnet.net> writes:
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:50:09 -0400 schrieb Chad J:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:59:47 -0400 schrieb Chad J:
pedro alves wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Chad J wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Hello,
i have try to compile void main() {}
but i get the following error message:
hansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
character is ` '
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd
sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccx3xcRb.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
Under debian sarge and under ubuntu 6.0.6 I have copy the
arm-wince-pe directory to /usr/local and i have extended
the PATH Variavble.
Manfred
Argh, I can't replicate it, even when I move it my other system. The
catch is that I've used both systems to develop this, so maybe there
is a missing dependency that I don't know about.
Btw, I compiled and used this on kubuntu 6.0.6. The other system is
coLinux running Debian.
In a while I'll make another coLinux Debian w/ fresh filesystem, and
see how that goes.
Those error messages look like the ones I got when the arm-wince-pe
assembler was given x86 assembly code.
Now I'm no cross-compiling expert, but that last statement would back
up my first thought: did you build arm-wince-pe binutils to go with
your arm-wince-pe-gdc? In particular arm-wince-pe-gas?
Maybe only on one system (that being the one where it works)?
That sure looks like it. That is arm assembly on the error log, and ' '
is the comment char on arm assembly,
and it is also the first character the assembler is complaining about.
Isn't there a gdc -v switch to show what commands are being invoked?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
hehe I was just about to ask for that.
Manfred, try
arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
and give us the output.
To answer your question Frits, the binutils come from a cegcc linux
binary prerelease. As a result, the binutils were built on a computer
that is not my own, only the arm-wince-pe-gdc itself (and *-gcc and
*-g++) were built by me. They are bundled with the compiler and have
worked for me. It looks from the errors like the binutils are working
fine, they just can't turn x86 assembly into ARM machine code.
This is the with switch -v:
ansen manni-lx:~/dd$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v -c hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-wince-pe
Configured with: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d
-quiet -dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase-strip hello_arm -version -o
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.sGNU D version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param ggc-min-heapsize=64021
as -o hello_arm /tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:6: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:7: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
` '
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:8: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:9: Error: no such instruction: `stmfd sp!,{fp,ip,lr,pc}'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:10: Error: too many memory references for `sub'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:11: Error: no such instruction: `bl __gccmain'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:12: Error: expecting operand after ','; got nothing
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:13: Error: too many memory references for `mov'
/tmp/ccJ0gw9a.s:14: Error: no such instruction: `ldmfd sp,{fp,sp,pc}'
On my debian system i have made a softlink from /usr/bin/as to
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
Then it was possible to compile an object file.
I have delete the softlink and it is also posslible to make a
object file. I dont't now why?
Here is the output:
n localhost:~$ arm-wince-pe-gdc -v hello_arm.d -o hello_arm
Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet.
Lesen der Spezifikationen von
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-wince-pe/lib/libgphobos.spec
Spezifikation wird von lib nach liborig umbenannt
Ziel: arm-wince-pe
Konfiguriert mit: /gdc/18/configure --prefix=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe
--disable-unix --with-newlib --enable-multilib=no --enable-languages=c,d,c++
--with-build-time-tools=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin
--with-as=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as
--with-ld=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-ld
--with-sysroot=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe --target=arm-wince-pe
--enable-phobos-config-dir=/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/phobos-config
Thread-Modell: single
gcc-Version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149)
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/cc1d hello_arm.d
-quiet -dumpbase hello_arm.d -auxbase hello_arm -version -o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
GNU D version 4.0.3 (gdc 0.18, using dmd 0.149) (arm-wince-pe)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5).
GGC-Heuristik: --param ggc-min-expand=47 --param ggc-min-heapsize=31989
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as -o /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o /tmp/ccMvNpIe.s
/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/libexec/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/collect2 -Bdynamic -o
hello_arm /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm
wince-pe/lib/crt0.o /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../../../arm-
ince-pe/lib/crtst.o -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib/gcc/arm-wince-pe/4.0.3/../../..
../arm-wince-pe/lib -L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/lib
-L/usr/local/arm-wince-pe/usr/lib /tmp/ccuCDAcn.o -lgphobos -lm -lcegcc -lgcc
-lm -lcoredll -lcegcc -lgcc
collect2: �ld� kann nicht gefunden werden
I looks much better.
Only one problem with collect2 .
Manfred
Ah it seems to be the opposite of what I though, it is using an x86
assembler to assemble ARM code. Notice that in the top log it invokes
'as' instead of /usr/local/arm-wince-pe/bin/arm-wince-pe-as. In the
bottom log it seems to be unable to find 'ld', when it should be using
arm-wince-pe-ld.
I am wondering if it can't find the files in */bin for some reason, and
ends up falling back on the local system files that are used for x86. I
also have a hunch this could be something to do with permissions.
If you don't need to restrict access to the compiler, try this:
cd /usr/local
chmod -R a=rwx arm-wince-pe
Then try compiling.
Thank you, i have successfully compiled the first programm.
I have compiled your example wich write the file doutput.txt .
This programm have i copied to the sd Card and rename the programm to
Hello_arm.exe .
But it do nothing on my PDA.
My PDA is a YAKUMO with Windows mobile 4.2 .
The CPU is S3C2410 it should be compatible with ARM920T .
I have read i must copy the programm with Active Sync or i must
build a "cab" file?
Manfred
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Thank you, i have successfully compiled the first programm.
I have compiled your example wich write the file doutput.txt .
This programm have i copied to the sd Card and rename the programm to
Hello_arm.exe .
But it do nothing on my PDA.
My PDA is a YAKUMO with Windows mobile 4.2 .
The CPU is S3C2410 it should be compatible with ARM920T .
I have read i must copy the programm with Active Sync or i must
build a "cab" file?
Manfred
First, download this PocketConsole and install it on your PDA. It
allows you to see command line output. Run it, then run Hello_arm.exe
from the command line. If it's screaming any errors at you, you'll see
them. Give me the output of your program, if any.
Here's the link:
http://www.symbolictools.de/public/pocketconsole/download.htm
Copying the .exe somewhere with Active Sync should be fine. You don't
need to build a .cab file. Also, if you are creating a replica of my
program, try running it in the root directory, as that's where I ran
mine. I'm still not sure how pathing works on WinCE.
↑ ↓ ← → Manfred Hansen <m.hansen kielnet.net> writes:
First, download this PocketConsole and install it on your PDA. It
allows you to see command line output. Run it, then run Hello_arm.exe
from the command line. If it's screaming any errors at you, you'll see
them. Give me the output of your program, if any.
Here's the link:
http://www.symbolictools.de/public/pocketconsole/download.htm
Copying the .exe somewhere with Active Sync should be fine. You don't
need to build a .cab file. Also, if you are creating a replica of my
program, try running it in the root directory, as that's where I ran
mine. I'm still not sure how pathing works on WinCE.
Everything work fine.
I have made a screenshot:
http://www.steinmole.de/d/wince.bmp
I copy the arm-wince-pe-gdc.tar.gz under
http://www.steinmole.de/d/arm-wince-pe-gdc.tar.bz2
You have made a great job.
Thank you.
Manfred
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Everything work fine.
I have made a screenshot:
http://www.steinmole.de/d/wince.bmp
I copy the arm-wince-pe-gdc.tar.gz under
http://www.steinmole.de/d/arm-wince-pe-gdc.tar.bz2
You have made a great job.
Thank you.
Manfred
You're welcome.
I'm glad you like it.
↑ ↓ ← → "John Reimer" <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:16:03 -0700, Chad J
<gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> wrote:
Manfred Hansen wrote:
Thank you, i have successfully compiled the first programm.
I have compiled your example wich write the file doutput.txt .
This programm have i copied to the sd Card and rename the programm to
Hello_arm.exe .
But it do nothing on my PDA.
My PDA is a YAKUMO with Windows mobile 4.2 .
The CPU is S3C2410 it should be compatible with ARM920T .
I have read i must copy the programm with Active Sync or i must build
a "cab" file?
Manfred
First, download this PocketConsole and install it on your PDA. It
allows you to see command line output. Run it, then run Hello_arm.exe
from the command line. If it's screaming any errors at you, you'll see
them. Give me the output of your program, if any.
Here's the link:
http://www.symbolictools.de/public/pocketconsole/download.htm
Copying the .exe somewhere with Active Sync should be fine. You don't
need to build a .cab file. Also, if you are creating a replica of my
program, try running it in the root directory, as that's where I ran
mine. I'm still not sure how pathing works on WinCE.
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of software
and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the rest of us are
stuck? I know of know working command line for windows mobile 5. :(
-JJR
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
John Reimer wrote:
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of
software and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the rest
of us are stuck? I know of know working command line for windows
mobile 5. :(
-JJR
Dang, I didn't know that.
WM5.suckyness++;
I already read that SynCE doesn't work with WM5 yet. This all makes me
not like WM5. I'm going to be looking at a new PDA soon, perhaps an
Axim x50v (like you have it seems), and I'll be avoiding WM5. Hoping
for WM3 SE or something.
As for "what if I don't have a command line", well, I was hoping to
hijack stderr in phobos and make it open a window to display the error
message or some such. This would allow people to see the error messages
without special software like pocketconsole. This is kind of low
priority for me right now though, what with the gc crashing. Damn
windows thread API is making it hard for me to get a non-pseudo thread
handle...
↑ ↓ ← → "John Reimer" <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:01:23 -0700, Chad J
<gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of
software and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the rest
of us are stuck? I know of know working command line for windows
mobile 5. :(
-JJR
Dang, I didn't know that.
WM5.suckyness++;
I already read that SynCE doesn't work with WM5 yet. This all makes me
not like WM5. I'm going to be looking at a new PDA soon, perhaps an
Axim x50v (like you have it seems), and I'll be avoiding WM5. Hoping
for WM3 SE or something.
WM5 is a pain. Not bad. But not good either. Not really an improvement at
all over the PPC2003 SE from the UI perspective, other than proper support
for VGA displays. X50V is a good price now, especially since Dell is no
longer making PDAs, so expect no more support. In the end, many users have
been sorely dissappointed with them mostly because of lack of support from
Dell concerning WM5. Probably more so since people were given the upgrade
option to WM5 and found it buggy (on that device; my experience and
disappointment with WM5 may be mostly due to the problems I've had with
using it on the X50v).
Dell pretty much ignored everybody's complaints because the device was all
but discontinued by then. The stock OS provided with the X50v is the
PocketPC 2003 SE. It runs fine, but then its display stretches to the
640x480 resolution and runs absolutely horribly slow (the GUI) despite
having the uber-fast processor inside. That's why I was so excited to try
WM5 because not only was it supposed to run at the native resolution, but
the screen performance was supposed to be fast (and it is indeed a huge
improvement over the PPC 2003 SE screen which was designed for 320x200).
WM5 also had persistant storage after backup battery loss. A very
important improvement over PPC2003 and earlier. I enjoyed the
improvements for awhile, but repeatedly got annoyed over some software
glitches in the both the OS and software that didn't know how to play
nicely with the new OS; this usually meant the battery ran dry far faster
than expected because the software litterly sucked the juice out of the
unit when it was supposedly "off" or in sleep mode. Not a nice thing.
So it's your call. My father actually has the X30 and PPC2003 SE. He
seems to have no troubles with it, and it's actually a bonus having the
240x320 resolution in that case because you don't get any problems with
poor support and slow performance as you would with the high resolution
displays. You might consider that or the X50 (QVGA version). It's your
call. :)
What still bothers me, though, is that the old Palm OS 5 devices (like the
Tungsten C) had incrediblely fast UI's and seemed to perform simply and
responsively at all times. I miss that greatly, and it's always made me
sore at MS for their inability to accomplish the same thing despite all
the time and opportunity they've poured into the Windows Mobile systems.
-JJR
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
John Reimer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:01:23 -0700, Chad J
<gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of
software and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the
rest of us are stuck? I know of know working command line for
windows mobile 5. :(
-JJR
Dang, I didn't know that.
WM5.suckyness++;
I already read that SynCE doesn't work with WM5 yet. This all makes
me not like WM5. I'm going to be looking at a new PDA soon, perhaps
an Axim x50v (like you have it seems), and I'll be avoiding WM5.
Hoping for WM3 SE or something.
WM5 is a pain. Not bad. But not good either. Not really an improvement
at all over the PPC2003 SE from the UI perspective, other than proper
support for VGA displays. X50V is a good price now, especially since
Dell is no longer making PDAs, so expect no more support. In the end,
many users have been sorely dissappointed with them mostly because of
lack of support from Dell concerning WM5. Probably more so since people
were given the upgrade option to WM5 and found it buggy (on that
device; my experience and disappointment with WM5 may be mostly due to
the problems I've had with using it on the X50v).
Dell pretty much ignored everybody's complaints because the device was
all but discontinued by then. The stock OS provided with the X50v is
the PocketPC 2003 SE. It runs fine, but then its display stretches to
the 640x480 resolution and runs absolutely horribly slow (the GUI)
despite having the uber-fast processor inside. That's why I was so
excited to try WM5 because not only was it supposed to run at the
native resolution, but the screen performance was supposed to be fast
(and it is indeed a huge improvement over the PPC 2003 SE screen which
was designed for 320x200). WM5 also had persistant storage after backup
battery loss. A very important improvement over PPC2003 and earlier.
I enjoyed the improvements for awhile, but repeatedly got annoyed over
some software glitches in the both the OS and software that didn't know
how to play nicely with the new OS; this usually meant the battery ran
dry far faster than expected because the software litterly sucked the
juice out of the unit when it was supposedly "off" or in sleep mode.
Not a nice thing.
So it's your call. My father actually has the X30 and PPC2003 SE. He
seems to have no troubles with it, and it's actually a bonus having the
240x320 resolution in that case because you don't get any problems with
poor support and slow performance as you would with the high resolution
displays. You might consider that or the X50 (QVGA version). It's
your call. :)
What still bothers me, though, is that the old Palm OS 5 devices (like
the Tungsten C) had incrediblely fast UI's and seemed to perform simply
and responsively at all times. I miss that greatly, and it's always
made me sore at MS for their inability to accomplish the same thing
despite all the time and opportunity they've poured into the Windows
Mobile systems.
-JJR
Thanks for the info.
I was eyeballing the x50v on Ebay for its good price. I was kind of
counting on that slowness, but not from the OS :(. I want to take
advantage of 480x640 with the game I am coding, and I'd have a platform
to test on and see first hand. So I did the math - CPU is clocked %50
faster, but 4x more pixels to push. Not good. It means my 240x320 at
400 MHz probably won't be representative. Maybe the intel graphics
accelerator will help, though I'd have to do extra OpenGL work (oh
well). Wonder how much juice that gfx accelerator sucks.
But for personal use it might not be my first choice from what I'm
reading (battery life GOOD, slowness BAD). hmmmm...
↑ ↓ ← → "John Reimer" <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:31:19 -0700, Chad J
<gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the info.
I was eyeballing the x50v on Ebay for its good price. I was kind of
counting on that slowness, but not from the OS :(. I want to take
advantage of 480x640 with the game I am coding, and I'd have a platform
to test on and see first hand. So I did the math - CPU is clocked %50
faster, but 4x more pixels to push. Not good. It means my 240x320 at
400 MHz probably won't be representative. Maybe the intel graphics
accelerator will help, though I'd have to do extra OpenGL work (oh
well). Wonder how much juice that gfx accelerator sucks.
But for personal use it might not be my first choice from what I'm
reading (battery life GOOD, slowness BAD). hmmmm...
Well, I may be overreacting to some extent. Some games seemed to take
advantage of the appropriate accelerated drivers and performed quite
well. At least the sample games included were just fine. So really the
slowness of the screen seemed limited to GUI operation only, while using
the Dell for everyday tasks. Even that feel could be slightly improved by
moving the CPU to its highest speed mode.
-JJR
↑ ↓ ← → pedro alves <pedro.alves domatica.pt> writes:
John Reimer wrote:
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of
software and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the rest of
us are stuck? I know of know working command line for windows mobile 5. :(
-JJR
For Pocketconsole to work in WM5, you may need to set
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\Console\OutputTo to 0.
It has been reported to work, although I never tested it.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
↑ ↓ ← → "John Reimer" <terminal.node gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 06:18:05 -0700, pedro alves <pedro.alves domatica.pt>
wrote:
John Reimer wrote:
Well... that's unfortunate. Pocketconsole is a very old piece of
software and doesn't support Windows Mobile 5.0. So I guess the rest
of us are stuck? I know of know working command line for windows
mobile 5. :(
-JJR
For Pocketconsole to work in WM5, you may need to set
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\Console\OutputTo to 0.
It has been reported to work, although I never tested it.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
That did indeed work. Thank you very much! Pocket Console now works fine
on the Dell X50v with windows mobile 5.0!
-JJR
↑ ↓ ← → Chad J <gamerChad _spamIsBad_gmail.com> writes:
I believe the garbage collector is broken for this right now. It
crashes during collection. I'll be debugging that.
|
|