• z gg.com Aug 26 2005
• z gg.com Aug 26 2005
• Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> Aug 26 2005
• z gg.com Aug 26 2005
• Stewart Gordon <smjg_1998 yahoo.com> Aug 31 2005

digitalmars.D.bugs/4837

Instead, the generated binary will abort at run-time and give misleading
message:


int f() {
return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted
}

int main(char[][] args) {
f();
return 0;
}

int f() {
  // return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted


need to comment out line 3 to see the error.

}

int main(char[][] args) {
f();
return 0;
}

z gg.com wrote:
 digitalmars.D.bugs/4837



Thank you for confessing your sin.

http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB  P+ L E  W++  N+++ o K- w++  O? M V? PS- PE- Y? 
PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Thank you for confessing your sin.

http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html


(Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)

I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.

Ideally, we have 2 compilers now, so we should have 3 bug lists:

D.gdc.bugs
D.dmd.bugs
D.gdc-dmd-common.bugs

z gg.com wrote:
 Thank you for confessing your sin.

 http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html


 (Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)
 
 I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.



If you'd followed the link above, you'd know that you haven't 
crossposted.  You've multiposted.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB  P+ L E  W++  N+++ o K- w++  O? M V? PS- PE- Y? 
PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on 
the 'group where everyone may benefit.