• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (8/8) Jun 01 2005 Saw this too late, but it seems that the -framework
• David Friedman (4/15) Jun 02 2005 The -framework option works for all the 3.3.x GCCs that I have built.
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (14/16) Jun 03 2005 Nothing special, just an extra G3/G4/G5 CPU patch applied...
• David Friedman (3/28) Jun 03 2005 I would try stepping through the code in gcc.c that checks for "-framewo...
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (6/9) Jun 04 2005 Argh, stepped through the whole thing and no traces of framework...

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

Saw this too late, but it seems that the -framework
was broken again in GDC 0.12 ? (-Wl,-framework, works)


gdc: Carbon: No such file or directory
cc1d: error: unrecognized option `-framework'

Just a minor annoyance, that I thought was gone now ?
(back to the workaround for now, maybe fix for 0.13)

--anders

David Friedman <d3rdclsmail_a_ _t_earthlink_d_._t_net> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:
 Saw this too late, but it seems that the -framework
 was broken again in GDC 0.12 ? (-Wl,-framework, works)
 

 gdc: Carbon: No such file or directory
 cc1d: error: unrecognized option `-framework'
 
 Just a minor annoyance, that I thought was gone now ?
 (back to the workaround for now, maybe fix for 0.13)
 
 --anders

The -framework option works for all the 3.3.x GCCs that I have built. 
Are the patches being applied to the same way?

David

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

David Friedman wrote:

 The -framework option works for all the 3.3.x GCCs that I have built. 
 Are the patches being applied to the same way?

Nothing special, just an extra G3/G4/G5 CPU patch applied...
http://www.algonet.se/~afb/d/gcc-3.3.5-powerpc.patch

GCC 3.3.6 was used, and the gcc-3.x patches from the distro:

- gcc-3.3.5-framework-headers.patch
- gcc-3.3.5-framework-linker.patch
- gcc-3.3.5-powerpc.patch

- patch-gcc-3.3.x
- patch-toplev-3.3.x
- patch-gcc-darwin-eh-3.3.x

All the other patches were disabled for the "gdcmac" build...
(most of them were for GCC anyway, except for the Phobos ones)

Is there a simple way to check or debug it, see what's wrong ?

--anders

David Friedman <d3rdclsmail_a t_earthlink_d.t_net> writes:

Anders F Björklund wrote:
 David Friedman wrote:
 
 The -framework option works for all the 3.3.x GCCs that I have built. 
 Are the patches being applied to the same way?

 
 
 Nothing special, just an extra G3/G4/G5 CPU patch applied...
 http://www.algonet.se/~afb/d/gcc-3.3.5-powerpc.patch
 
 GCC 3.3.6 was used, and the gcc-3.x patches from the distro:
 
 - gcc-3.3.5-framework-headers.patch
 - gcc-3.3.5-framework-linker.patch
 - gcc-3.3.5-powerpc.patch
 
 - patch-gcc-3.3.x
 - patch-toplev-3.3.x
 - patch-gcc-darwin-eh-3.3.x
 
 All the other patches were disabled for the "gdcmac" build...
 (most of them were for GCC anyway, except for the Phobos ones)
 
 Is there a simple way to check or debug it, see what's wrong ?
 
 --anders

I would try stepping through the code in gcc.c that checks for "-framework".

David

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= <afb algonet.se> writes:

David Friedman wrote:

 Is there a simple way to check or debug it, see what's wrong ?

 I would try stepping through the code in gcc.c that checks for 
 "-framework".

Argh, stepped through the whole thing and no traces of framework...

That's because the patches had silently failed at an earlier step.


Note to self: "patch || exit 1" !

Seems to work just fine again now.

--anders