www.digitalmars.com Home | Search | C & C++ | D | DMDScript | News Groups | index | prev | next
Archives

D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger

C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows

digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

D - command line =

↑ ↓ ← Karl Bochert <kbochert copper.net> writes:
Would it be possible to allow command-line options without
 the '='?  The watcom compiler, for instance, allows the use of
'#' instead of the '=' so that batch files will work.

I am aware of the use of shell.exe, but it appears to require
operation from a dos box, lest its console disappear.

I would prefer to be able to just double-click a batch file
to build, rather than opening a console and typing in
the command and target.

A minor nuisance that would require minor effort to fix.

Karl Bochert
Dec 04 2002
↑ ↓ → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
That's a good idea. -Walter

"Karl Bochert" <kbochert copper.net> wrote in message
news:1103_1039068254 bose...
 Would it be possible to allow command-line options without
  the '='?  The watcom compiler, for instance, allows the use of
 '#' instead of the '=' so that batch files will work.

 I am aware of the use of shell.exe, but it appears to require
 operation from a dos box, lest its console disappear.

 I would prefer to be able to just double-click a batch file
 to build, rather than opening a console and typing in
 the command and target.

 A minor nuisance that would require minor effort to fix.

 Karl Bochert

Dec 12 2002