• Andy Walker (7/7) May 27 2002 Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions? ...
• Walter (5/12) May 27 2002 What do you mean? The version statement also will work for language
• Pavel Minayev (6/11) May 27 2002 am

Andy Walker <Andy_member pathlink.com> writes:

Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I am
not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but
different.

I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version
0.0.0.1".  

Andy Walker
jawalker stl.quik.com

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

What do you mean? The version statement also will work for language
extensions.

"Andy Walker" <Andy_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:acua7u$2u47$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I

am
 not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but
 different.

 I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version
 0.0.0.1".

 Andy Walker
 jawalker stl.quik.com

"Pavel Minayev" <evilone omen.ru> writes:

"Andy Walker" <Andy_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:acua7u$2u47$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 Is Bright (D) to the point where it makes sense to talk about versions?  I

am
 not talking about the "version" keyword.  That is another GREAT idea, but
 different.

 I would like to see comments like "That construction sundowned in version
 0.0.0.1".

Well, it already had pointer declaration syntax changed, then comparison
ops, and also some functions are deprecated (string.toCharz, for instance).
I don't remember the version numbers, though.