• Matthew (2/2) Mar 14 2004 We could really do with a printf_assert(), in order to print out details...
• Piotr Fusik (4/6) Mar 14 2004 I'd prefer:
• J C Calvarese (10/19) Mar 14 2004 I'd prefer:
• Matthew (7/21) Mar 14 2004 of
• J Anderson (6/12) Mar 14 2004 Me too. It's just common sense that assert with printf functionality

"Matthew" <matthew stlsoft.org> writes:

We could really do with a printf_assert(), in order to print out details of
asserts and assert in a single statement

Piotr Fusik <Piotr_member pathlink.com> writes:

We could really do with a printf_assert(), in order to print out details of
asserts and assert in a single statement

I'd prefer:
assert foo == bar, "foo=$foo bar=$bar";
or (Java-like):
assert foo == bar : "foo " ~ foo ~ " bar=" ~ bar;

J C Calvarese <jcc7 cox.net> writes:

Piotr Fusik wrote:
We could really do with a printf_assert(), in order to print out details of
asserts and assert in a single statement

 
 I'd prefer:
 assert foo == bar, "foo=$foo bar=$bar";
 or (Java-like):
 assert foo == bar : "foo " ~ foo ~ " bar=" ~ bar;
 

I'd prefer:
assert(x==1, "x: %d", x);

assert(testExpression, formattingString, ...);

(I like the parentheses on assert.)

I think adding optional output options on assert would be great. I think 
I'd use it often.

-- 
Justin
http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

"Matthew" <matthew stlsoft.org> writes:

"J C Calvarese" <jcc7 cox.net> wrote in message
news:c31vsi$vo6$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Piotr Fusik wrote:
We could really do with a printf_assert(), in order to print out details



of
asserts and assert in a single statement

 I'd prefer:
 assert foo == bar, "foo=$foo bar=$bar";
 or (Java-like):
 assert foo == bar : "foo " ~ foo ~ " bar=" ~ bar;

 I'd prefer:
 assert(x==1, "x: %d", x);

 assert(testExpression, formattingString, ...);

That's a good suggestion. I've spent heaps of time putting printf stuff in
and around invariants this w/e, as I've been working on DTL containers.
Lists were especially assertive ... ;)

 (I like the parentheses on assert.)

Indeed.

J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> writes:

J C Calvarese wrote:

 I'd prefer:
 assert(x==1, "x: %d", x);

 assert(testExpression, formattingString, ...);

 (I like the parentheses on assert.)

 I think adding optional output options on assert would be great. I 
 think I'd use it often.

Me too.  It's just common sense that assert with printf functionality 
would look like this.  C/C++ programmers will instantly know how to use 
this.

-- 
-Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/