D - DMD 0.81 release
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Mar 07 2004
- Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> Mar 07 2004
- Brad Anderson <brad sankaty.dot.com> Mar 07 2004
- Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> Mar 07 2004
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_Jim=E9nez?= <jujibo inicia.es> Mar 08 2004
- imr1984 <imr1984_member pathlink.com> Mar 08 2004
- "KTC" <me here.com> Mar 08 2004
- "sammy" <sammy.deroy sympatico.ca> Mar 08 2004
- "Phill" <phill pacific.net.au> Mar 09 2004
- Juan C <Juan_member pathlink.com> Mar 08 2004
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_Jim=E9nez?= <jujibo inicia.es> Mar 08 2004
- "KTC" <me here.com> Mar 08 2004
- J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> Mar 09 2004
- "C. Sauls" <ibisbasenji yahoo.com> Mar 09 2004
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_Jim=E9nez?= <jujibo inicia.es> Mar 09 2004
- J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> Mar 09 2004
- Charles Hixson <charleshixsn earthlink.net> Mar 09 2004
- C <dont respond.com> Mar 10 2004
- "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> Mar 10 2004
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Mar 11 2004
- "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> Mar 11 2004
Fixes build break in Ant's DUI. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Mar 07 2004
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:56:05 -0800, Walter wrote:Fixes build break in Ant's DUI.
(not that we don't trust you;) Yes it does! thank you! I also confirmed the same name for module and class. (this means I have to release a .81 aware version of DUI (some implicit double to int were found). DUI now (tomorrow) supports event callbaks through delegates) Anthttp://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Mar 07 2004
DUI now (tomorrow) supports event callbaks through delegates)
And I'm looking forward to you bringing this expertise to our SWT port. Were you able to check the code out via Subversion client? BA
Mar 07 2004
Ant <duitoolkit yahoo.ca> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:36:30 -0600, Brad Anderson wrote:DUI now (tomorrow) supports event callbaks through delegates)
And I'm looking forward to you bringing this expertise to our SWT port. Were you able to check the code out via Subversion client? BA
Yes, I have the code, didn't look at it yet... Ant
Mar 07 2004
Walter wrote:Fixes build break in Ant's DUI. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
Mar 08 2004
i agree. i have loads of dmd.zips around the place. In article <c2hc5p$2c6n$1 digitaldaemon.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_Jim=E9nez?= says...Walter wrote:Fixes build break in Ant's DUI. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
Mar 08 2004
"imr1984" wrote in message...i agree. i have loads of dmd.zips around the place.
Normally when I download updated version of new software, I just delete the old version. (Sometime makeing sure the new one works first ^_^) However, I does still have DMD v0.50 laying around somewhere :-D It's not the earliest version I download but the the earliest that I still have a copy of... I wonder what the earliest version of DMD people still have ? KTC -- Experience is a good school but the fees are high. - Heinrich Heine
Mar 08 2004
"KTC" <me here.com> wrote in message news:c2i5cs$ndh$1 digitaldaemon.com...It's not the earliest version I download but the the earliest that I still have a copy of... I wonder what the earliest version of DMD people still have ?
D ALPHA Experimental release www.digitalmars.com Digital Mars D Compiler ALPHA v0.18 Copyright (c) 1999-2002 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html Usage: dmd files.d ... { -switch } files.d D source files -c do not link -d allow deprecated features -g add symbolic debug info -gt add trace profiling hooks -v verbose -O optimize -oobjdir write .obj files to directory objdir -Ipath where to look for imports -debug compile in debug code -debug=level compile in debug code <= level -debug=ident compile in debug code identified by ident -release compile release version -unittest compile in unit tests -version=level compile in version code >= level -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident
Mar 08 2004
You could alternativly save it as a different name. Phill. "KTC" <me here.com> wrote in message news:c2i5cs$ndh$1 digitaldaemon.com..."imr1984" wrote in message...i agree. i have loads of dmd.zips around the place.
Normally when I download updated version of new software, I just delete the old version. (Sometime makeing sure the new one works first ^_^) However, I does still have DMD v0.50 laying around somewhere :-D It's not the earliest version I download but the the earliest that I still have a copy of... I wonder what the earliest version of DMD people still have ? KTC -- Experience is a good school but the fees are high. - Heinrich Heine
Mar 09 2004
Whenever I download one I add the version number myself -- dmd081.zip In article <c2ho9r$30cr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, imr1984 says...i agree. i have loads of dmd.zips around the place. In article <c2hc5p$2c6n$1 digitaldaemon.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Julio_Jim=E9nez?= says...Walter wrote:Fixes build break in Ant's DUI. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
Mar 08 2004
Juan C wrote:Whenever I download one I add the version number myself -- dmd081.zip
I do it too. But how do you know that the version you are downloading is the right?..... by example if Walter forget upgrade the website... or there is a net problem... :-) regards Julio
Mar 08 2004
"Julio Jiménez" wrote...I do it too. But how do you know that the version you are
the right?..... by example if Walter forget upgrade the website...
there is a net problem... :-) regards Julio
Yeah, had a problem like this few months ago when an assembler I'm using was updated and put up on the website. However, when I go & download it, it gave me the old thing. Turned out my ISP was caching the old copy on their server and it wasn't updating properly. Had to resort to rerouting my internet through my uni proxy to get the updated version or else I would have had to wait for like another couple of weeks (after I complained!). To discover whether you've got the new version, of course you can just type dmd to see what it says ;-) KTC -- Experience is a good school but the fees are high. - Heinrich Heine
Mar 08 2004
imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it. -- -Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/
Mar 09 2004
J Anderson wrote:imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it.
Simple: link file. All hail POSIX filesystems. -C. Sauls -Invironz
Mar 09 2004
J Anderson wrote:imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it.
And... how do you know what is the mos recent version before download it? ... :-) actually the filename is allways dmd.zip regards Julio
Mar 09 2004
Julio Jiménez wrote:J Anderson wrote:imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it.
And... how do you know what is the mos recent version before download it? ... :-) actually the filename is allways dmd.zip regards Julio
Before, see the webpage. After check the date. Actually I think it's possible to check the file date without downloading it. For an automated file downloader simply checking the size normally works. PS - Sorry everyone for sending to their email, the button in mozilla has changed locations and I'm not used to its position. -- -Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/
Mar 09 2004
J Anderson wrote:Julio Jiménez wrote:J Anderson wrote:imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it.
And... how do you know what is the mos recent version before download it? ... :-) actually the filename is allways dmd.zip regards Julio
Before, see the webpage. After check the date. Actually I think it's possible to check the file date without downloading it. For an automated file downloader simply checking the size normally works. PS - Sorry everyone for sending to their email, the button in mozilla has changed locations and I'm not used to its position.
Yes.. of course.. throw ftp to ditigitalmars.com you can see the date and test if it is newer than yours before download it. But with version number in filename you can test the name and split the version number too... and really know that it is the version you want.... Really that's not a problem, only saying what I think about it... visit sourceforge.net all the projects (or almost all) have version number to follow it's changes in the time. Regards. Julio
Mar 09 2004
J Anderson wrote:imr1984 wrote:Would be good to write the version number in the zip file dmd.zip -> dmd-0.81.zip or something regards Julio
I'll point out one disadvantage of this idea: It makes it harder for automated updaters to find the most recent version of DMD. Of course you could have two files or another file that has the latest update file location in it.
If that's a serious problem, it's easily solved. Merely have two files on the server. One the latest version, with the number included (e.g., dmd-0.81.zip) and the other a simple link to it which provides you with a file named dmd.zip, which is actually constructed by sending the numbered version. I'm rather sure that this is simple no matter which web server you are using. OTOH, I'd be staisfied if it just said on the web page which file was being downloaded. Say within a line of the download link.
Mar 09 2004
Is any of the stuff in /etc/c/stlsoft usable in D ? And why is thier .cpp files in /etc/c/recls ? C On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:56:05 -0800, Walter <walter digitalmars.com> wrote= :Fixes build break in Ant's DUI. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
-- = Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Mar 10 2004
"C" <dont respond.com> wrote in message news:opr4n2yke3ehmtou localhost | Is any of the stuff in /etc/c/stlsoft usable in D ? | | And why is thier .cpp files in /etc/c/recls ? | | C | I have a question about phobos: what is it, exactly? I mean, is Phobos the D runtime library for the DigitalMars compiler, or is it the D runtime library? In other words, what parts of Phobos should be in every D compiler? ----------------------- Carlos Santander Bernal
Mar 10 2004
"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message news:c2ok8u$efd$2 digitaldaemon.com..."C" <dont respond.com> wrote in message news:opr4n2yke3ehmtou localhost | Is any of the stuff in /etc/c/stlsoft usable in D ? | | And why is thier .cpp files in /etc/c/recls ? | | C | I have a question about phobos: what is it, exactly? I mean, is Phobos the
runtime library for the DigitalMars compiler, or is it the D runtime library? In other words, what parts of Phobos should be in every D
The parts of phobos in std should be in every D compiler, the parts in etc are optional.
Mar 11 2004
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c2pdlv$1oms$1 digitaldaemon.com | The parts of phobos in std should be in every D compiler, | the parts in etc are optional. That's what I thought. But what about std.recls and std.windows.registry? According to their license, they're property of Synesis Software. It just seems a bit odd to me to have something like that as part as the standard library. ----------------------- Carlos Santander Bernal
Mar 11 2004
Carlos Santander B. wrote:"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c2pdlv$1oms$1 digitaldaemon.com | The parts of phobos in std should be in every D compiler, | the parts in etc are optional. That's what I thought. But what about std.recls and std.windows.registry? According to their license, they're property of Synesis Software. It just seems a bit odd to me to have something like that as part as the standard library.
Well, either the new compiler vendor would have to make a deal with Matthew (Synesis) or reimplement the API. Lars Ivar Igesund
Mar 11 2004
Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:Carlos Santander B. wrote:"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:c2pdlv$1oms$1 digitaldaemon.com | The parts of phobos in std should be in every D compiler, | the parts in etc are optional. That's what I thought. But what about std.recls and std.windows.registry? According to their license, they're property of Synesis Software. It just seems a bit odd to me to have something like that as part as the standard library.
Well, either the new compiler vendor would have to make a deal with Matthew (Synesis) or reimplement the API. Lars Ivar Igesund
And that would happen. Cheers, Sigbjørn Lund Olsen (Beware: This message contains irony.)
Mar 12 2004