• "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> Jan 05 2004
• J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> Jan 05 2004
• "Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> Jan 05 2004
• "C" <dont respond.com> Jan 05 2004

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

I'd like to be able to call toString() as a member for built-in types, as
in:

int    i;

printf("%.*s\n", i.toString());

That way I can write generic code that will work for built-ins and Object
derived ones.

J Anderson <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> writes:

Matthew wrote:

I'd like to be able to call toString() as a member for built-in types, as
in:

int    i;

printf("%.*s\n", i.toString());

That way I can write generic code that will work for built-ins and Object
derived ones.


  


wrap the toString calls in functions. But I think you already know that.

Anderson

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:

 Matthew wrote:

I'd like to be able to call toString() as a member for built-in types, as
in:

int    i;

printf("%.*s\n", i.toString());

That way I can write generic code that will work for built-ins and Object
derived ones.


 wrap the toString calls in functions. But I think you already know that.


Sure. We can use shims, but shims are (in my own little world at least -
http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8681/cuj0308wilson/) in large part a fix for
C++'s inadequacies. I've no doubt they'll feature in D to a significant
extent, but anywhere we can do without is a boon to readability, even if it
makes no difference to performance and expressiveness.

"C" <dont respond.com> writes:

Seconded , I think this little bit will go a long way for the language.

C

"Matthew" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:btbpjq$2fa1$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 I'd like to be able to call toString() as a member for built-in types, as
 in:

 int    i;

 printf("%.*s\n", i.toString());

 That way I can write generic code that will work for built-ins and Object
 derived ones.