www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D - DMD 0.66 release

reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
Many minor bugs fixed.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Jun 08 2003
next sibling parent "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> writes:
I've been wanting to ask this for a couple of weeks now, and now I feel it's
a good time to do so.

Are there any major changes expected in the language design? Because I'm
starting to believe that it could be a good moment to have a final release.
What do you all think?

—————————————————————————
Carlos Santander


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 2003-06-05
Jun 08 2003
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Patrick Down <pat codemoon.com> writes:
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
 digitaldaemon.com:


 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



What happened to the -o option?  It used to
let me set the obj file directory.
Jun 08 2003
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Patrick Down" <pat codemoon.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom 63.105.9.61...

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
  digitaldaemon.com:


 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



 What happened to the -o option?  It used to
 let me set the obj file directory.



Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!
Jun 08 2003
parent reply Patrick Down <pat codemoon.com> writes:
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1
 digitaldaemon.com:


 
 "Patrick Down" <pat codemoon.com> wrote in message
 news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom 63.105.9.61...

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
  digitaldaemon.com:


 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



 What happened to the -o option?  It used to
 let me set the obj file directory.



 Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!



The "help" listed below has two definitions for it
and "-o filename    name output file" seems to be
the fuctionality now.  

Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65
Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
Usage:
  dmd files.d ... { -switch }

  files.d        D source files
  -c             do not link
  -d             allow deprecated features
  -g             add symbolic debug info
  -gt            add trace profiling hooks
  -v             verbose
  -O             optimize
  -oobjdir       write object files to directory objdir
  -o filename    name output file
  -Ipath         where to look for imports
  -Llinkerflag   pass linkerflag to link
  -debug         compile in debug code
  -debug=level   compile in debug code <= level
  -debug=ident   compile in debug code identified by ident
  -inline        do function inlining
  -release       compile release version
  -unittest      compile in unit tests
  -version=level compile in version code >= level
  -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident
Jun 09 2003
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
Are you using the windows or linux version?

"Patrick Down" <pat codemoon.com> wrote in message
news:Xns939555016675patcodemooncom 63.105.9.61...

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc13ci$2k3c$1
  digitaldaemon.com:


 "Patrick Down" <pat codemoon.com> wrote in message
 news:Xns9394EC4C4963patcodemooncom 63.105.9.61...

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
  digitaldaemon.com:


 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html



 What happened to the -o option?  It used to
 let me set the obj file directory.



 Hmm. Nothing should have happened to it!



 The "help" listed below has two definitions for it
 and "-o filename    name output file" seems to be
 the fuctionality now.

 Digital Mars D Compiler Beta v0.65
 Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Digital Mars written by Walter Bright
 www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
 Usage:
   dmd files.d ... { -switch }

   files.d        D source files
   -c             do not link
   -d             allow deprecated features
   -g             add symbolic debug info
   -gt            add trace profiling hooks
   -v             verbose
   -O             optimize
   -oobjdir       write object files to directory objdir
   -o filename    name output file
   -Ipath         where to look for imports
   -Llinkerflag   pass linkerflag to link
   -debug         compile in debug code
   -debug=level   compile in debug code <= level
   -debug=ident   compile in debug code identified by ident
   -inline        do function inlining
   -release       compile release version
   -unittest      compile in unit tests
   -version=level compile in version code >= level
   -version=ident compile in version code identified by ident
Jun 09 2003
parent reply Patrick Down <Patrick_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

Are you using the windows or linux version?



Windows
Jun 09 2003
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:bc2bj8$nhv$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

Are you using the windows or linux version?






Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file
name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the
output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.
Jun 09 2003
parent reply Patrick Down <Patrick_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:bc2bj8$nhv$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

Are you using the windows or linux version?






Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable file
name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be the
output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.



Ok, I understand.  But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for the
output file and intermediate dicrectory.
Jun 09 2003
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:bc2ml4$12aj$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 In article <bc2i1i$tu0$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

"Patrick Down" <Patrick_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:bc2bj8$nhv$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 In article <bc2b9u$n5v$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says...

Are you using the windows or linux version?






Here's how it works. If linking, the -o is assumed to be the executable







name. If not linking, and the filename ends in .obj, it is assumed to be







output .obj name. Otherwise, it is taken to be the output directory.



 Ok, I understand.  But it would seem desirable to have a separate flag for




 output file and intermediate dicrectory.



You're right, it is a little confusing.
Jun 09 2003
prev sibling next sibling parent Patrick Down <pat codemoon.com> writes:
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
 digitaldaemon.com:


 Many minor bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
 
 




The following should print:
count = 10

instead it prints:
count = 0


class Foo 
{
  void Func(bit delegate() call)
  {
    for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
      call();
  }
}

class Bar
{
	void Func()
	{
		int count = 0;
		
		Foo ic = new Foo();
		
		ic.Func(delegate bit() { ++count; return false; } );
		
		printf("count = %d\n",count);
	}
}

int main(char[][] argv)
{
	Bar b = new Bar();
	
	b.Func();
	
	return 0;
}
Jun 09 2003
prev sibling next sibling parent reply Patrick Down <pat codemoon.com> writes:
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in news:bc0d2j$20r6$1
 digitaldaemon.com:


 Many minor bugs fixed.
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
 
 



Walter the Windows version in the latest zip file has
version number 0.65 did it get updated to 0.66?
It was downloaded from  ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.zip
Jun 09 2003
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Patrick Down" <pat codemoon.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9395D338E3F2Epatcodemooncom 63.105.9.61...

 Walter the Windows version in the latest zip file has
 version number 0.65 did it get updated to 0.66?
 It was downloaded from  ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.zip



Yeah, I know. <g>. It's still 0.66, though.
Jun 09 2003
prev sibling next sibling parent Russ Lewis <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> writes:
The following source prints out "default" on dmd linux 0.66:

int main(char[][] args)
{
   switch("asdf")
   {
   case "asdf":
     printf("asdf\n");
     break;
 

   case "jkl":
     printf("jkl\n");
     break;
 

   default:
     printf("default\n");
   }
 

   return 0;
}

If I change the switch to switch on args[1], then the switch works as it 
should.
Jun 10 2003
prev sibling parent reply "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> writes:
I have this:

-----a.d
class A {}
-----b.d
private import a;
class B:A {}
-----c.d
import b;
B x; //works
A y; //doesn't work. great!
b.a.A z; //works

My question is if the last line should work. I'm not saying it shouldn't, I
just want to know.

—————————————————————————
Carlos Santander


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.488 / Virus Database: 287 - Release Date: 2003-06-05
Jun 10 2003
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message
news:bc61cl$vr7$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I have this:

 -----a.d
 class A {}
 -----b.d
 private import a;
 class B:A {}
 -----c.d
 import b;
 B x; //works
 A y; //doesn't work. great!
 b.a.A z; //works

 My question is if the last line should work. I'm not saying it shouldn't,




 just want to know.



I know about that case, and have mixed feelings about whether it should work
that way or be a bug.
Jun 11 2003
parent reply Andy Friesen <andy ikagames.com> writes:
Walter wrote:

 "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message
 news:bc61cl$vr7$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 

I have this:

-----a.d
class A {}
-----b.d
private import a;
class B:A {}
-----c.d
import b;
B x; //works
A y; //doesn't work. great!
b.a.A z; //works

My question is if the last line should work. I'm not saying it shouldn't,



 I
 

just want to know.



 
 I know about that case, and have mixed feelings about whether it should work
 that way or be a bug.
 



Since b is its own namespace, I can't see how that could ever cause a 
problem.  In fact, it looks like a useful construct, since it forces the 
fully qualified name to be used.

It is kind of misleading, though, seeing as how private tends to 
indicate that nobody outside the module should be able to see it.

Perhaps a protected import, or something of the like, is in order.
Jun 11 2003
parent Georg Wrede <Georg_member pathlink.com> writes:
In article <bc7b28$24th$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Andy Friesen says...

Walter wrote:

 "Carlos Santander B." <carlos8294 msn.com> wrote in message
 news:bc61cl$vr7$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 

I have this:

-----a.d
class A {}
-----b.d
private import a;
class B:A {}
-----c.d
import b;
B x; //works
A y; //doesn't work. great!
b.a.A z; //works

My question is if the last line should work. I'm not saying it shouldn't,



 I
 

just want to know.



 
 I know about that case, and have mixed feelings about whether it should work
 that way or be a bug.
 



Since b is its own namespace, I can't see how that could ever cause a 
problem.  In fact, it looks like a useful construct, since it forces the 
fully qualified name to be used.

It is kind of misleading, though, seeing as how private tends to 
indicate that nobody outside the module should be able to see it.

Perhaps a protected import, or something of the like, is in order.



I think it definitely should not work. One way to think
about it is: If b does a PRIVATE import, then the
understood meaning is that b does not want the
whole world to gain access to all of a.

To let b.a.A work here would need a SERIOUS argument for it.
We're developing a Straightforward language without undue 
catches and complications.
Jun 11 2003