D - OT Evolution of a programmer
- Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> May 29 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> May 29 2003
- "Peter Hercek" <vvp no.post.spam.sk> Jun 03 2003
- "Luna Kid" <lunakid neuropolis.org> Jun 04 2003
- "Peter Hercek" <vvp no.post.spam.sk> Jun 04 2003
- "Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> Jun 07 2003
- Helmut Leitner <leitner hls.via.at> Jun 07 2003
- "Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> Jun 07 2003
"Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bb5sbc$1i3q$1 digitaldaemon.com...http://www.ariel.com.au/jokes/The_Evolution_of_a_Programmer.html
So true! I especially like the "Master Programmer".
May 29 2003
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bb694t$21km$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bb5sbc$1i3q$1 digitaldaemon.com...http://www.ariel.com.au/jokes/The_Evolution_of_a_Programmer.html
So true! I especially like the "Master Programmer".
I liked most Chief Executive :) I have seen this may be 10 years ago when "Master Programmer" have been writting client served code for X Windows and not MS COM :o) Wondering, what this change does mean?
Jun 03 2003
"Peter Hercek" <vvp no.post.spam.sk> wrote in message news:bbjj8e$26gi$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bb694t$21km$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bb5sbc$1i3q$1 digitaldaemon.com...http://www.ariel.com.au/jokes/The_Evolution_of_a_Programmer.html
So true! I especially like the "Master Programmer".
I liked most Chief Executive :) I have seen this may be 10 years ago when "Master Programmer" have been writting client served code for X Windows and not MS COM :o) Wondering, what this change does mean?
:) It means this "evolution of a programmer" is two-dimensional: one is the evolution within the life of one person, and the other is the evolution of "the programmer", as a profession, over that decade. As the CEO stuff is the same as 10 years ago [is it really?] that also means the evolution of the manager (as a profession) has already reached its final stage where there is nowhere to develop further... Sz.
Jun 04 2003
"Luna Kid" <lunakid neuropolis.org> wrote in message news:bbka16$2re2$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Peter Hercek" <vvp no.post.spam.sk> wrote in message news:bbjj8e$26gi$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bb694t$21km$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:bb5sbc$1i3q$1 digitaldaemon.com...http://www.ariel.com.au/jokes/The_Evolution_of_a_Programmer.html
So true! I especially like the "Master Programmer".
I liked most Chief Executive :) I have seen this may be 10 years ago when "Master Programmer" have been writting client served code for X Windows and not MS COM :o) Wondering, what this change does mean?
:) It means this "evolution of a programmer" is two-dimensional: one is the evolution within the life of one person, and the other is the evolution of "the programmer", as a profession, over that decade. As the CEO stuff is the same as 10 years ago [is it really?] that also means the evolution of the manager (as a profession) has already reached its final stage where there is nowhere to develop further...
Yep :o), CEO tried to use some unix terminal almost as a chat program ... had problems with "events" too. Evolution ... good idea ... not sure whether the direction is right COM is still unecessary complicated at C/C++ level :-/ Well you can generate a lot of it with some wizadards.
Jun 04 2003
It seems like that was one of the main design points with COM, the ability to construct programs as data. It seems useful. Automating program-building will make all our lives easier. I'd much rather work in a tree-view (you can sort by category, or alphabetically, etc) than in some unorganized (or worse, badly-organized) raw text file that usually doesn't even word wrap automatically. So primitive. I've messed with Optima++, Delphi, C#, they all seem to be headed in the same general direction. It's too bad C# chose to hobble the programmers as they did. Sean "Peter Hercek" <vvp no.post.spam.sk> wrote in message news:bbm9ug$1pit$1 digitaldaemon.com...Evolution ... good idea ... not sure whether the direction is right COM is still unecessary complicated at C/C++ level :-/ Well you can generate a lot of it with some wizadards.
Jun 07 2003
"Sean L. Palmer" wrote:It seems like that was one of the main design points with COM, the ability to construct programs as data. It seems useful. Automating program-building will make all our lives easier. I'd much rather work in a tree-view (you can sort by category, or alphabetically, etc) than in some unorganized (or worse, badly-organized) raw text file that usually doesn't even word wrap automatically. So primitive. I've messed with Optima++, Delphi, C#, they all seem to be headed in the same general direction. It's too bad C# chose to hobble the programmers as they did.
Then I think you should like the Lava programming language that turns away from textual representations: <http://www.sit.fraunhofer.de/Lava/> -- Helmut Leitner leitner hls.via.at Graz, Austria www.hls-software.com
Jun 07 2003
"Sean L. Palmer" <palmer.sean verizon.net> "Helmut Leitner" <leitner hls.via.at> wrote in message news:3EE1AC63.722E0FAF hls.via.at..."Sean L. Palmer" wrote:It seems like that was one of the main design points with COM, the
to construct programs as data. It seems useful. Automating program-building will make all our lives easier. I'd much rather work in a tree-view (you can sort by category,
alphabetically, etc) than in some unorganized (or worse,
raw text file that usually doesn't even word wrap automatically. So primitive. I've messed with Optima++, Delphi, C#, they all seem to be headed in the same general direction. It's too bad C# chose to hobble the programmers
they did.
Then I think you should like the Lava programming language that turns away from textual representations: <http://www.sit.fraunhofer.de/Lava/>
I do like it. They make a lot of good points. If someone could just gather up all the points made by all these language designers, solve them, and back the product by a company that's going to be around for a long time, and actually get the product out the door so I can use it, well that'd just be peachy. ;) Sean
Jun 07 2003