www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

D - what does "xxxx has initializer Object" mean ?

reply "Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn l8night.co.uk> writes:
Just recompiling my dx libs,
I get the warning "primSurface has initializer Object"

from the code
 IDirectDrawSurface primSurface = null;

and it seems that my old dx code no longer works ...
has something changed in the way COM interfaces are handled ?

Mike.
Feb 11 2003
parent reply "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
Hmm, that's a debug message that shouldn't be appearing (it's commented out
in the source). Are you using the latest build?

"Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn l8night.co.uk> wrote in message
news:b2cbnq$272j$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Just recompiling my dx libs,
 I get the warning "primSurface has initializer Object"

 from the code
  IDirectDrawSurface primSurface = null;

 and it seems that my old dx code no longer works ...
 has something changed in the way COM interfaces are handled ?

 Mike.

Feb 13 2003
parent reply "Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn l8night.co.uk> writes:
right, 0.52 not 0.53
yes its gone away :)
been replaced with
Max # of fixups = 708
is this something I should consider important ?

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:b2glao$2aas$2 digitaldaemon.com...
 Hmm, that's a debug message that shouldn't be appearing (it's commented

 in the source). Are you using the latest build?

 "Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn l8night.co.uk> wrote in message
 news:b2cbnq$272j$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 Just recompiling my dx libs,
 I get the warning "primSurface has initializer Object"

 from the code
  IDirectDrawSurface primSurface = null;

 and it seems that my old dx code no longer works ...
 has something changed in the way COM interfaces are handled ?

 Mike.


Feb 13 2003
parent "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Mike Wynn" <mike.wynn l8night.co.uk> wrote in message
news:b2gn21$2c2c$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 right, 0.52 not 0.53
 yes its gone away :)
 been replaced with
 Max # of fixups = 708
 is this something I should consider important ?

No, ignore it. -Walter
Feb 14 2003