D - I don't know
- Mike <Mike_member pathlink.com> Jan 22 2003
- "Sean L. Palmer" <seanpalmer directvinternet.com> Jan 23 2003
- "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> Jan 23 2003
- Mike <Mike_member pathlink.com> Jan 23 2003
- Ilya Minkov <midiclub 8ung.at> Jan 24 2003
- Mike <Mike_member pathlink.com> Jan 26 2003
- Ilya Minkov <midiclub tiscali.de> Jan 27 2003
Hello, I'm coming from RAD land, I don't understand what use has a programing language without a user interface? I understand the dos days, ok , but thats over . I really would appreciate it, most probably I am missing something..
Jan 22 2003
Well for starters, you can use it to *write* a user interface. ;) Also it's not a great idea to tie a language too tightly to a particular interface, be it graphical or text. If you need a pretty IDE with drag and drop buttons and forms, D is too early along in development for that yet. Come back in a year or so. Every language has to start somewhere, and while Walter is like a one man Army, he isn't Microsoft; the WYSIWYG dialog editors will have to come later. Sean "Mike" <Mike_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:b0o34e$27lv$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hello, I'm coming from RAD land, I don't understand what use has a
language without a user interface? I understand the dos days, ok , but
over . I really would appreciate it, most probably I am missing something..
Jan 23 2003
"Sean L. Palmer" <seanpalmer directvinternet.com> wrote in message news:b0og91$2er2$1 digitaldaemon.com...Every language has to start somewhere, and while Walter is like a one man Army, he isn't Microsoft; the WYSIWYG dialog editors will have to come later.
Writing wysisyg dialog editors is not a core competency of mine :-( so I'm hoping someone else will rise to that challenge!
Jan 23 2003
In article <b0qdai$hlm$3 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says..."Sean L.
messagenews:b0og91$2er2$1 digitaldaemon.com...Every language has to start
Army, he isn't Microsoft; the
later.
with there styleWriting wysisyg dialog editors is not a core competency of
hoping someone else will rise to that challenge!
Jan 23 2003
Sean L. Palmer wrote:Well for starters, you can use it to *write* a user interface. ;) Also it's not a great idea to tie a language too tightly to a particular interface, be it graphical or text. If you need a pretty IDE with drag and drop buttons and forms, D is too early along in development for that yet. Come back in a year or so. Every language has to start somewhere, and while Walter is like a one man Army, he isn't Microsoft; the WYSIWYG dialog editors will have to come later. Sean
Well, i am also originally coming from RAD, but i didn't like it there. I also consider it harmful, not knowing about the usual loopback interfaces and such, which is a classical programming practice applicable to many daily tasks, hidden from RADlers. It is important to devise a cross-platform GUI library. Then a UI builder can be written. Not the other way around. :> I might volunteer to write a GUI builder if i appear to like the GUI library, which i shall not design myself, but will keep dropping "wishes" in. :> For now i'm planning to write a "c-hea.d" utility, which does -- guess what! But i'll be busy for the next 2 weeks and won't actually start until afterwards. I first planned to do it in OCaml, but i think i'll rather stick to D. -i.
Jan 24 2003
In article <b0rvu3$1atm$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ilya Minkov says...Sean L.
Well for starters, you can use it to *write* a user interface.
Also it's not a great idea to tie a language too tightly to a
interface, be it graphical or text. If you need a pretty
early along in development
Every language has to start
Army, he isn't Microsoft; the
later. Sean
Well, i am
I also consider
interfaces and such, which is
applicable to many daily tasks, hidden from
It is important to devise a cross-platform GUI library. Then a UI builder can be written. Not the other way around. :> I might volunteer to write a GUI builder if i appear to like the GUI library, which i shall not design myself, but will keep dropping "wishes" in. :> For now i'm planning to write a "c-hea.d" utility, which does -- guess what!
But i'll be busy for the next 2 weeks and won't actually startuntil afterwards. I first planned to do it in OCaml, but i think i'll rather stick to D. -i.
Jan 26 2003
Mike wrote:For now i'm planning to write a "c-hea.d" utility, which does -- guess what!
I don't have the slightest idea
Convert C headers into D imports, so that existing C libraries and interfaces can be easily used.
Jan 27 2003









Mike <Mike_member pathlink.com> 