www.digitalmars.com Home | Search | C & C++ | D | DMDScript | News Groups | index | prev | next
Archives

D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger

C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows

digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

c++ - templates

↑ ↓ ← "Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> writes:
Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but
finally gave up because

"Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
templates
implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)

Has this issue been addressed yet?

Ed Sowell
Nov 23 2001
↑ ↓ "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series,
but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter


"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message
news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...
 Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but
 finally gave up because

 "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
 templates
 implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)

 Has this issue been addressed yet?

 Ed Sowell

Nov 23 2001
↑ ↓ reiter nomadics.com (Mac Reiter) writes:
Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are
part of the "not perfect yet" category?  This is the most precise term
I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a
class (which may or may not be a template itself).  'vector' has a
constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as
several other templatized members.

Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current
project.

(And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things
and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...)
Mac

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com>
wrote:

There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series,
but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter


"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message
news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...
 Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but
 finally gave up because

 "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
 templates
 implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)

 Has this issue been addressed yet?

 Ed Sowell


Jan 21 2002
↑ ↓ → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
Yes, you'd be correct! I will get them implemented, though. -Walter

"Mac Reiter" <reiter nomadics.com> wrote in message
news:3c4c6e33.336720909 news.digitalmars.com...
 Would I be correct in my belief that "template member functions" are
 part of the "not perfect yet" category?  This is the most precise term
 I have been able to find for templatized functions as members of a
 class (which may or may not be a template itself).  'vector' has a
 constructor that is templatized to take a interator class, as well as
 several other templatized members.

 Just curious, 'coz it's keeping me from testing DMC on my current
 project.

 (And yes, I do understand that templates are amazingly hairy things
 and that the developer list for DMC is pretty short...)
 Mac

 On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:29:59 -0800, "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com>
 wrote:

There have been many improvements in template support in the 8.2x series,
but they aren't perfect yet. -Walter


"Edward F. Sowell" <sowelled home.com> wrote in message
news:3BFE7AD8.44E23681 home.com...
 Back in January I was trying to compile my code with DC++ 8.0B2, but
 finally gave up because

 "Basically, you've run into the fact that DMC++ does not have the
 templates
 implemented as proposed in the latest standards." (Jan Knepper)

 Has this issue been addressed yet?

 Ed Sowell



Jan 21 2002